502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28385434)
21. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of single crowns fabricated from ultrasound digital impressions.
Praça L; Pekam FC; Rego RO; Radermacher K; Wolfart S; Marotti J
Dent Mater; 2018 Nov; 34(11):e280-e288. PubMed ID: 30268677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique.
Lima FF; Neto CF; Rubo JH; Santos GC; Moraes Coelho Santos MJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data.
Patzelt SB; Bishti S; Stampf S; Att W
J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25359645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies.
González de Villaumbrosia P; Martínez-Rus F; García-Orejas A; Salido MP; Pradíes G
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):543-550.e1. PubMed ID: 27112413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization.
Güth JF; Runkel C; Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Keul C
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1445-1455. PubMed ID: 27406138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of different complete coverage onlay preparation designs and the intraoral scanner on the accuracy of digital scans.
de Andrade GS; Luz JN; Tribst JPM; Chun EP; Bressane A; Borges ALS; Saavedra GSFA
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1168-1177. PubMed ID: 35717209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained from Intraoral and Extraoral Dental Scanners with Different CAD/CAM Scanning Technologies: An In Vitro Study.
Ellakany P; Tantawi ME; Mahrous AA; Al-Harbi F
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):314-319. PubMed ID: 34085355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.
Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study.
Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Trueness of CAD/CAM digitization with a desktop scanner - an in vitro study.
Joós-Kovács G; Vecsei B; Körmendi S; Gyarmathy VA; Borbély J; Hermann P
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Dec; 19(1):280. PubMed ID: 31830970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Scanning accuracy of nondental structured light extraoral scanners compared with that of a dental-specific scanner.
Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Jiménez-Martínez MJ; Revilla-León M
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):110-114. PubMed ID: 32665118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparative analysis of 3D data accuracy of single tooth and full dental arch captured by different intraoral and laboratory digital impression systems].
Ryakhovskiy AN; Kostyukova VV
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2016; 95(4):65-70. PubMed ID: 27636766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible.
Hayama H; Fueki K; Wadachi J; Wakabayashi N
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 29502933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark.
Kim JE; Amelya A; Shin Y; Shim JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):755-761. PubMed ID: 27863856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Marginal fit of zirconia copings fabricated after conventional impression making and digital scanning: An in vitro study.
Carrilho Baltazar Vaz IM; Pimentel Coelho Lino Carracho JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):223.e1-223.e6. PubMed ID: 32336539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
