302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28385435)
21. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
Kane LM; Chronaios D; Sierraalta M; George FM
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three- and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study.
Bayramoğlu E; Özkan YK; Yildiz C
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25858218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of repeated porcelain firings on the marginal fit of millable and conventional casting alloys.
Giti R; Hosseinpour Aghaei M; Mohammadi F
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0275374. PubMed ID: 37874843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques.
Witkowski S; Komine F; Gerds T
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16872930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of marginal fit of single implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns prepared by using presintered metal blocks.
Pasali B; Sarac D; Kaleli N; Sarac YS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):257-262. PubMed ID: 28545869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings.
Kocaağaoğlu H; Kılınç HI; Albayrak H
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 27622786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of veneering on the marginal fit of CAD/CAM-generated, copy-milled, and cast metal copings.
Ates SM; Yesil Duymus Z; Caglar I; Hologlu B
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2553-2560. PubMed ID: 28091875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques.
Papadiochou S; Pissiotis AL
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):545-551. PubMed ID: 28967399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of different CAD-CAM materials on the marginal and internal adaptation of endocrown restorations: An in vitro study.
El Ghoul WA; Özcan M; Ounsi H; Tohme H; Salameh Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):128-134. PubMed ID: 31027958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Marginal and internal fit of metal copings fabricated with rapid prototyping and conventional waxing.
Farjood E; Vojdani M; Torabi K; Khaledi AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 27460320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38.
Gurel K; Toksavul S; Toman M; Tamac E
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jun; 22(6):812-816. PubMed ID: 31187767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
