BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28385577)

  • 1. Carbamates and ICH M7 classification: Making use of expert knowledge.
    Hemingway R; Fowkes A; Williams RV
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Jun; 86():392-401. PubMed ID: 28385577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Utility of published DNA reactivity alerts.
    Myden A; Guesne SJ; Cayley A; Williams RV
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():77-86. PubMed ID: 28549899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transitioning to composite bacterial mutagenicity models in ICH M7 (Q)SAR analyses.
    Landry C; Kim MT; Kruhlak NL; Cross KP; Saiakhov R; Chakravarti S; Stavitskaya L
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Dec; 109():104488. PubMed ID: 31586682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Principles and procedures for implementation of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses.
    Amberg A; Beilke L; Bercu J; Bower D; Brigo A; Cross KP; Custer L; Dobo K; Dowdy E; Ford KA; Glowienke S; Van Gompel J; Harvey J; Hasselgren C; Honma M; Jolly R; Kemper R; Kenyon M; Kruhlak N; Leavitt P; Miller S; Muster W; Nicolette J; Plaper A; Powley M; Quigley DP; Reddy MV; Spirkl HP; Stavitskaya L; Teasdale A; Weiner S; Welch DS; White A; Wichard J; Myatt GJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():13-24. PubMed ID: 26877192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing best practise in the application of expert review of mutagenicity under ICH M7.
    Barber C; Amberg A; Custer L; Dobo KL; Glowienke S; Van Gompel J; Gutsell S; Harvey J; Honma M; Kenyon MO; Kruhlak N; Muster W; Stavitskaya L; Teasdale A; Vessey J; Wichard J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Oct; 73(1):367-77. PubMed ID: 26248005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extending (Q)SARs to incorporate proprietary knowledge for regulatory purposes: A case study using aromatic amine mutagenicity.
    Ahlberg E; Amberg A; Beilke LD; Bower D; Cross KP; Custer L; Ford KA; Van Gompel J; Harvey J; Honma M; Jolly R; Joossens E; Kemper RA; Kenyon M; Kruhlak N; Kuhnke L; Leavitt P; Naven R; Neilan C; Quigley DP; Shuey D; Spirkl HP; Stavitskaya L; Teasdale A; White A; Wichard J; Zwickl C; Myatt GJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():1-12. PubMed ID: 26879463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the impact of expert knowledge on ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions. Is expert review still needed?
    Jayasekara PS; Skanchy SK; Kim MT; Kumaran G; Mugabe BE; Woodard LE; Yang J; Zych AJ; Kruhlak NL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 125():105006. PubMed ID: 34273441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of in silico systems and expert knowledge for structure-based assessment of potentially mutagenic impurities.
    Sutter A; Amberg A; Boyer S; Brigo A; Contrera JF; Custer LL; Dobo KL; Gervais V; Glowienke S; van Gompel J; Greene N; Muster W; Nicolette J; Reddy MV; Thybaud V; Vock E; White AT; Müller L
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 67(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 23669331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of genotoxic potential of cosmetic ingredients by an in silico battery system consisting of a combination of an expert rule-based system and a statistics-based system.
    Aiba née Kaneko M; Hirota M; Kouzuki H; Mori M
    J Toxicol Sci; 2015 Feb; 40(1):77-98. PubMed ID: 25743748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The importance of expert review to clarify ambiguous situations for (Q)SAR predictions under ICH M7.
    Foster RS; Fowkes A; Cayley A; Thresher A; Werner AD; Barber CG; Kocks G; Tennant RE; Williams RV; Kane S; Stalford SA
    Genes Environ; 2020; 42():27. PubMed ID: 32983286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the utility of common arguments used in expert review of in silico predictions as part of ICH M7 assessments.
    Cayley AN; Foster RS; Brigo A; Muster W; Musso A; Kenyon MO; Parris P; White AT; Cohen-Ohana M; Nudelman R; Glowienke S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Oct; 144():105490. PubMed ID: 37659712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of 11 in silico models for the prediction of small molecule mutagenicity: role of steric hindrance and electron-withdrawing groups.
    Ford KA; Ryslik G; Chan BK; Lewin-Koh SC; Almeida D; Stokes M; Gomez SR
    Toxicol Mech Methods; 2017 Jan; 27(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 27813437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. (Q)SAR assessments of potentially mutagenic impurities: a regulatory perspective on the utility of expert knowledge and data submission.
    Powley MW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 25545315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mutagenicity assessment strategy for pharmaceutical intermediates to aid limit setting for occupational exposure.
    Araya S; Lovsin-Barle E; Glowienke S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Nov; 73(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 26454093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resolution of contradiction between in silico predictions and Ames test results for four pharmaceutically relevant impurities.
    Gunther WC; Kenyon MO; Cheung JR; Dugger RW; Dobo KL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Dec; 91():68-76. PubMed ID: 29061373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Principles and procedures for handling out-of-domain and indeterminate results as part of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses.
    Amberg A; Andaya RV; Anger LT; Barber C; Beilke L; Bercu J; Bower D; Brigo A; Cammerer Z; Cross KP; Custer L; Dobo K; Gerets H; Gervais V; Glowienke S; Gomez S; Van Gompel J; Harvey J; Hasselgren C; Honma M; Johnson C; Jolly R; Kemper R; Kenyon M; Kruhlak N; Leavitt P; Miller S; Muster W; Naven R; Nicolette J; Parenty A; Powley M; Quigley DP; Reddy MV; Sasaki JC; Stavitskaya L; Teasdale A; Trejo-Martin A; Weiner S; Welch DS; White A; Wichard J; Woolley D; Myatt GJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Mar; 102():53-64. PubMed ID: 30562600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of In Silico Methods for Regulatory Toxicological Assessment of Pharmaceutical Impurities.
    Kovarich S; Cappelli CI
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2425():537-560. PubMed ID: 35188646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A practice of expert review by read-across using QSAR Toolbox.
    Fukuchi J; Kitazawa A; Hirabayashi K; Honma M
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 30690463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A consortium-driven framework to guide the implementation of ICH M7 Option 4 control strategies.
    Barber C; Antonucci V; Baumann JC; Brown R; Covey-Crump E; Elder D; Elliott E; Fennell JW; Gallou F; Ide ND; Jordine G; Kallemeyn JM; Lauwers D; Looker AR; Lovelle LE; McLaughlin M; Molzahn R; Ott M; Schils D; Oestrich RS; Stevenson N; Talavera P; Teasdale A; Urquhart MW; Varie DL; Welch D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Nov; 90():22-28. PubMed ID: 28822875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Consultancy Activity on In Silico Models for Genotoxic Prediction of Pharmaceutical Impurities.
    Pavan M; Kovarich S; Bassan A; Broccardo L; Yang C; Fioravanzo E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():511-29. PubMed ID: 27311479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.