These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28386970)

  • 1. Lack of differentiation of allergic and irritant reactions by skin autofluorescence.
    Shin EJ; Gwak MJ; Jeong KH; Shin MK
    Contact Dermatitis; 2017 May; 76(5):318-321. PubMed ID: 28386970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image processing of 20 MHz B-scan recordings of irritant reactions.
    Seidenari S
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1995; 23():169-75. PubMed ID: 9035910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optical coherence tomography for patch test grading: A prospective study on its use for noninvasive diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis.
    Ruini C; Rahimi F; Fiocco Z; French LE; Hartmann D; Oppel E; Sattler E
    Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Mar; 84(3):183-191. PubMed ID: 33012002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Echographic evaluation of subclinical allergic patch test reactions.
    Seidenari S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Sep; 29(3):156-7. PubMed ID: 8222631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic utility of skin autofluorescence when patch test results are doubtful.
    Shin EJ; Seo JK; Lee EJ; Lee ES; Shin MK
    Skin Res Technol; 2019 Jan; 25(1):96-99. PubMed ID: 30055047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differentiating allergic and irritant contact dermatitis by high-definition optical coherence tomography: a pilot study.
    Boone MA; Jemec GB; Del Marmol V
    Arch Dermatol Res; 2015 Jan; 307(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 25186162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Echographic evaluation of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS)-induced irritation in mice.
    Seidenari S; Zanella C; Pepe P
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Jan; 30(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 8156762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The CXCR3 activating chemokines IP-10, Mig, and IP-9 are expressed in allergic but not in irritant patch test reactions.
    Flier J; Boorsma DM; Bruynzeel DP; Van Beek PJ; Stoof TJ; Scheper RJ; Willemze R; Tensen CP
    J Invest Dermatol; 1999 Oct; 113(4):574-8. PubMed ID: 10504443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dermoscopy of patch test reactions: study of applicability in differential diagnosis between allergic and irritant reactions.
    Corazza M; Toni G; Musmeci D; Scuderi V; Amendolagine G; Borghi A
    Br J Dermatol; 2019 Feb; 180(2):429-430. PubMed ID: 30382586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inducible nitric oxide synthase demonstrated in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
    Ormerod AD; Dwyer CM; Reid A; Copeland P; Thompson WD
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1997 Nov; 77(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 9394976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optoacoustic mesoscopy shows potential to increase accuracy of allergy patch testing.
    Hindelang B; Aguirre J; Berezhnoi A; He H; Eyerich K; Ntziachristos V; Biedermann T; Darsow U
    Contact Dermatitis; 2020 Sep; 83(3):206-214. PubMed ID: 32311105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patch test reactions through the lens of dermoscopy: Further insights, particularly on weak allergic reactions.
    Corazza M; Toni G; Scuderi V; Forconi R; Borghi A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Dec; 81(6):417-425. PubMed ID: 31373019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Histological distinction between early allergic and irritant patch test reactions: follicular spongiosis may be characteristic of early allergic contact dermatitis.
    Vestergaard L; Clemmensen OJ; Sørensen FB; Andersen KE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Oct; 41(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 10515099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative ultrasonic methods for characterization of skin lesions in vivo.
    Raju BI; Swindells KJ; Gonzalez S; Srinivasan MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Jun; 29(6):825-38. PubMed ID: 12837498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: Emerging Role in Noninvasive Diagnosis and Monitoring of Eczematous Dermatoses.
    Maarouf M; Costello CM; Gonzalez S; Angulo I; Curiel-Lewandrowski CN; Shi VY
    Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed); 2019 Oct; 110(8):626-636. PubMed ID: 31202471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrical impedance as a potential tool to distinguish between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
    Nyrén M; Kuzmina N; Emtestam L
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2003 Mar; 48(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 12637919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occupational allergic and irritant contact dermatitis in workers exposed to polyurethane foam.
    Kieć-Świerczyńska M; Swierczyńska-Machura D; Chomiczewska-Skóra D; Nowakowska-Świrta E; Kręcisz B
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2014 Apr; 27(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 24619739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is dermatitis palmaris sicca an irritant contact dermatitis?
    Chen FJ; Liu Z; Zhou Y; Chen YH; Fan YM
    Dermatitis; 2013; 24(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 23665830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The combined diagnosis of allergic and irritant contact dermatitis in a retrospective cohort of 1000 consecutive patients with occupational contact dermatitis.
    Schwensen JF; Menné T; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Dec; 71(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 25099171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of allergic and irritant patch test reactions using ImageJ.
    Ohshima H; Kinoshita S; Futagawa M; Takiwaki H; Washizaki K; Ishiko A; Kanto H
    Skin Res Technol; 2014 May; 20(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 24118475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.