138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28387996)
1. Porosity and tissue integration of elastic mesh implants evaluated in vitro and in vivo.
Ciritsis A; Horbach A; Staat M; Kuhl CK; Kraemer NA
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2018 Feb; 106(2):827-833. PubMed ID: 28387996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI Evaluation of an Elastic TPU Mesh under Pneumoperitoneum in IPOM Position in a Porcine Model.
Lambertz A; van den Hil LCL; Ciritsis A; Eickhoff R; Kraemer NA; Bouvy ND; Müllen A; Klinge U; Neumann UP; Klink CD
J Invest Surg; 2018 Jun; 31(3):185-191. PubMed ID: 28594257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Elastic mesh with thermoplastic polyurethane filaments preserves effective porosity of textile implants.
Lambertz A; Vogels RR; Binnebösel M; Schöb DS; Kossel K; Klinge U; Neumann UP; Klink CD
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2015 Aug; 103(8):2654-60. PubMed ID: 25630828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Elastic TPU Mesh as Abdominal Wall Inlay Significantly Reduces Defect Size in a Minipig Model.
Heise D; Eickhoff R; Kroh A; Binnebösel M; Klinge U; Klink CD; Neumann UP; Lambertz A
J Invest Surg; 2019 Sep; 32(6):501-506. PubMed ID: 29469618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved tissue integration of a new elastic intraperitoneal stoma mesh prosthesis.
Eickhoff R; Heise D; Kroh A; Helmedag M; Klinge U; Neumann UP; Klink CD; Lambertz A
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2020 Jul; 108(5):2250-2257. PubMed ID: 31967402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of adhesion formation of a new elastic thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) mesh in comparison to polypropylene (PP) meshes in IPOM position.
Lambertz A; van den Hil LCL; Schöb DS; Binnebösel M; Kroh A; Klinge U; Neumann UP; Klink CD
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jan; 53():366-372. PubMed ID: 26406584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First in vivo visualization of MRI-visible IPOM in a rabbit model.
Otto J; Kuehnert N; Kraemer NA; Ciritsis A; Hansen NL; Kuhl C; Busch D; Peter Neumann U; Klinge U; Conze KJ
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2014 Aug; 102(6):1165-9. PubMed ID: 24470265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modelling of compressible and orthotropic surgical mesh implants based on optical deformation measurement.
Horbach AJ; Duong MT; Staat M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():400-410. PubMed ID: 28697434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Topological Structure Design and Fabrication of Biocompatible PLA/TPU/ADM Mesh with Appropriate Elasticity for Hernia Repair.
Hu Q; Zhang R; Zhang H; Yang D; Liu S; Song Z; Gu Y; Ramalingam M
Macromol Biosci; 2021 Jun; 21(6):e2000423. PubMed ID: 33870647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of mesh topology in the abdominal wall repair process.
De Maria C; Burchielli S; Salvadori C; Santoro V; Montemurro F; Orsi G; Vozzi G
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2016 Aug; 104(6):1220-8. PubMed ID: 26097153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate postoperative changes in synthetic meshes - In vivo measurements.
Sindhwani N; Liaquat Z; Urbankova I; Vande Velde G; Feola A; Deprest J
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Mar; 55():228-235. PubMed ID: 26594782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance-visible meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Köhler G; Pallwein-Prettner L; Koch OO; Luketina RR; Lechner M; Emmanuel K
JSLS; 2015; 19(1):e2014.00175. PubMed ID: 25848195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-section modified and highly elastic sutures reduce tissue incision and show comparable biocompatibility: in-vitro and in-vivo evaluation of novel thermoplastic urethane surgical threads.
Helmedag M; Heise D; Eickhoff R; Kossel KM; Gries T; Jockenhoevel S; Neumann UP; Klink CD; Lambertz A
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2021 May; 109(5):693-702. PubMed ID: 33098257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Textile properties of synthetic prolapse mesh in response to uniaxial loading.
Barone WR; Moalli PA; Abramowitch SD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 215(3):326.e1-9. PubMed ID: 27001219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pore size and pore shape--but not mesh density--alter the mechanical strength of tissue ingrowth and host tissue response to synthetic mesh materials in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.
Lake SP; Ray S; Zihni AM; Thompson DM; Gluckstein J; Deeken CR
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Feb; 42():186-97. PubMed ID: 25486631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Synthetic surgical meshes used in abdominal wall surgery: Part II-Biomechanical aspects.
Todros S; Pavan PG; Pachera P; Natali AN
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2017 May; 105(4):892-903. PubMed ID: 26687728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo visualization of polymer-based mesh implants using conventional magnetic resonance imaging and positive-contrast susceptibility imaging.
Kraemer NA; Donker HC; Kuehnert N; Otto J; Schrading S; Krombach GA; Klinge U; Kuhl CK
Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):200-5. PubMed ID: 23344516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of chitosan fiber addition on the properties of polyurethane with thermo-responsive shape memory.
Kawaguchi K; Iijima M; Miyakawa H; Ohta M; Muguruma T; Endo K; Nakazawa F; Mizoguchi I
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2017 Jul; 105(5):1151-1156. PubMed ID: 27029842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Time-dependent changes of magnetic resonance imaging-visible mesh implants in patients.
Ciritsis A; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuehnert N; Otto J; Conze J; Klinge U; Kuhl CK; Kraemer NA
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):439-44. PubMed ID: 24651663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Degradation resistance of PVDF mesh in vivo in comparison to PP mesh.
Wang H; Klosterhalfen B; Müllen A; Otto T; Dievernich A; Jockenhövel S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jul; 119():104490. PubMed ID: 33780848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
