These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28388646)
21. A Bayesian Power Analysis Procedure Considering Uncertainty in Effect Size Estimates from a Meta-analysis. Du H; Wang L Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):589-605. PubMed ID: 27485763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean? Maxwell SE; Lau MY; Howard GS Am Psychol; 2015 Sep; 70(6):487-98. PubMed ID: 26348332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups. Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Open Science Collaboration Science; 2015 Aug; 349(6251):aac4716. PubMed ID: 26315443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. On the Reproducibility of Psychological Science. Johnson VE; Payne RD; Wang T; Asher A; Mandal S J Am Stat Assoc; 2017; 112(517):1-10. PubMed ID: 29861517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Null hypothesis significance testing and effect sizes: can we 'effect' everything … or … anything? Lovell DP Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2020 Apr; 51():68-77. PubMed ID: 31948894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estimating statistical power, posterior probability and publication bias of psychological research using the observed replication rate. Ingre M; Nilsonne G R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Sep; 5(9):181190. PubMed ID: 30839704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Meta-analysis and publication bias: How well does the FAT-PET-PEESE procedure work? Alinaghi N; Reed WR Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):285-311. PubMed ID: 29532634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Significance bias: an empirical evaluation of the oral health literature. Kagereki E; Gakonyo J; Simila H BMC Oral Health; 2016 May; 16(1):53. PubMed ID: 27150796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multicentre randomised trials in anaesthesia: an analysis using Bayesian metrics. Seretny M; Barlow J; Sidebotham D Anaesthesia; 2023 Jan; 78(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 36128627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Bayesian approach to meta-analysis of plant pathology studies. Mila AL; Ngugi HK Phytopathology; 2011 Jan; 101(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 20822433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results. Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):666-81. PubMed ID: 26186117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review. Sutton AJ; Song F; Gilbody SM; Abrams KR Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):421-45. PubMed ID: 11191259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Decision qualities of Bayes factor and p value-based hypothesis testing. Jeon M; De Boeck P Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):340-360. PubMed ID: 28594227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Facultative adjustment of the offspring sex ratio and male attractiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Booksmythe I; Mautz B; Davis J; Nakagawa S; Jennions MD Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Feb; 92(1):108-134. PubMed ID: 26405787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Publication bias in psychological science: comment on Ferguson and Brannick (2012). Rothstein HR; Bushman BJ Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 22369520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]