These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28388970)

  • 1. Contemporary imaging of auditory implants.
    Connor SEJ
    Clin Radiol; 2018 Jan; 73(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 28388970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants.
    Todt I; Rademacher G; Mittmann P; Mutze S; Ernst A
    HNO; 2017 Aug; 65(Suppl 2):81-86. PubMed ID: 28116456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants. German version].
    Todt I; Rademacher G; Mittmann P; Mutze S; Ernst A
    HNO; 2017 Sep; 65(9):735-740. PubMed ID: 27921114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging and anatomy for cochlear implants.
    Fishman AJ
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2012 Feb; 45(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 22115679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear implant assessment: imaging issues.
    Marsot-Dupuch K; Meyer B
    Eur J Radiol; 2001 Nov; 40(2):119-32. PubMed ID: 11704359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bony cochlear nerve canal and internal auditory canal measures predict cochlear nerve status.
    Tahir E; Bajin MD; Atay G; Mocan BÖ; Sennaroğlu L
    J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Aug; 131(8):676-683. PubMed ID: 28566097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sheep as a large animal model for middle and inner ear implantable hearing devices: a feasibility study in cadavers.
    Schnabl J; Glueckert R; Feuchtner G; Recheis W; Potrusil T; Kuhn V; Wolf-Magele A; Riechelmann H; Sprinzl GM
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):481-9. PubMed ID: 22410732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aplasia of the cochlea: radiologic assessment and options for hearing rehabilitation.
    Kontorinis G; Goetz F; Giourgas A; Lanfermann H; Lenarz T; Giesemann AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1253-60. PubMed ID: 23928521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of digital volume tomography in assessing the position of cochlear implant arrays in temporal bone specimens.
    Kurzweg T; Dalchow CV; Bremke M; Majdani O; Kureck I; Knecht R; Werner JA; Teymoortash A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 20440115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiologic evaluation of multichannel intracochlear implant insertion depth.
    Marsh MA; Xu J; Blamey PJ; Whitford LA; Xu SA; Silverman JM; Clark GM
    Am J Otol; 1993 Jul; 14(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 8238277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy.
    Papsin BC
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jan; 115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. PubMed ID: 15626926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imaging for cochlear implants.
    Phelps PD; Annis JA; Robinson PJ
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Jul; 63(751):512-6. PubMed ID: 2390686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of radiology in active middle ear implantation.
    Loney EL
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Aug; 69(8):e323-30. PubMed ID: 24780584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MRI versus CT in assessment of cochlear patency in cochlear implant candidates.
    Bettman R; Beek E; Van Olphen A; Zonneveld F; Huizing E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Jun; 124(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 15267175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification and revision of a displaced cochlear implant electrode in the internal auditory canal.
    Todt I; Rademacher G; Ernst A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Sep; 14(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 23510683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear implantation feasibility in rhesus macaque monkey: anatomic and radiologic results.
    Marx M; Girard P; Escudé B; Barone P; Fraysse B; Deguine O
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):e76-81. PubMed ID: 23921937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implants: three-dimensional localization by means of coregistration of CT and conventional radiographs.
    Whiting BR; Bae KT; Skinner MW
    Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 11687702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Neuroradiological imaging in patients with sensorineural hearing loss prior to cochlear implantation].
    Biller A; Bartsch A; Knaus C; Müller J; Solymosi L; Bendszus M
    Rofo; 2007 Sep; 179(9):901-13. PubMed ID: 17492536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implant candidates: assessment with CT and MR imaging.
    Harnsberger HR; Dart DJ; Parkin JL; Smoker WR; Osborn AG
    Radiology; 1987 Jul; 164(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 3108956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed tomography: how accurate a predictor for cochlear implantation?
    Wiet RJ; Pyle GM; O'Connor CA; Russell E; Schramm DR
    Laryngoscope; 1990 Jul; 100(7):687-92. PubMed ID: 2362528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.