153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28389095)
1. Chemometric evaluation of the combined effect of temperature, pressure, and co-solvent fractions on the chiral separation of basic pharmaceuticals using actual vs set operational conditions.
Forss E; Haupt D; Stålberg O; Enmark M; Samuelsson J; Fornstedt T
J Chromatogr A; 2017 May; 1499():165-173. PubMed ID: 28389095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of co-solvent fraction, pressure and temperature effects in analytical and preparative supercritical fluid chromatography.
Åsberg D; Enmark M; Samuelsson J; Fornstedt T
J Chromatogr A; 2014 Dec; 1374():254-260. PubMed ID: 25499060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chiral stationary phase optimized selectivity supercritical fluid chromatography: A strategy for the separation of mixtures of chiral isomers.
Hegade RS; Lynen F
J Chromatogr A; 2019 Feb; 1586():116-127. PubMed ID: 30583878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of column back pressure on supercritical fluid chromatography separations of enantiomers using binary mobile phases on 10 chiral stationary phases.
Wang C; Zhang Y
J Chromatogr A; 2013 Mar; 1281():127-34. PubMed ID: 23394748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Method development for impurity profiling in SFC: The selection of a dissimilar set of stationary phases.
Galea C; Mangelings D; Heyden YV
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2015; 111():333-43. PubMed ID: 25630237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of temperature and pressure effects on retention in supercritical fluid chromatography on polar stationary phases.
Ovchinnikov DV; Pokrovskiy OI; Kosyakov DS; Bogolitsyn KG; Ul'yanovskii NV; Falev DI
J Chromatogr A; 2020 Jan; 1610():460600. PubMed ID: 31610921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using subcritical/supercritical fluid chromatography to separate acidic, basic, and neutral compounds over an ionic liquid-functionalized stationary phase.
Chou FM; Wang WT; Wei GT
J Chromatogr A; 2009 Apr; 1216(16):3594-9. PubMed ID: 19269644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of reference conditions on flow rate, modifier fraction and retention in supercritical fluid chromatography.
De Pauw R; Shoykhet Choikhet K; Desmet G; Broeckhoven K
J Chromatogr A; 2016 Aug; 1459():129-135. PubMed ID: 27401813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of density on kinetic performance in supercritical fluid chromatography with methanol modified carbon dioxide.
Berger TA
J Chromatogr A; 2018 Aug; 1564():188-198. PubMed ID: 29929869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Purification of drug degradation products supported by analytical and preparative supercritical fluid chromatography.
Noireau A; Lemasson E; Mauge F; Petit AM; Bertin S; Hennig P; Lesellier É; West C
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2019 Jun; 170():40-47. PubMed ID: 30904738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Method developments approaches in supercritical fluid chromatography applied to the analysis of cosmetics.
Lesellier E; Mith D; Dubrulle I
J Chromatogr A; 2015 Dec; 1423():158-68. PubMed ID: 26553956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effect of sample solvents on retention in packed column supercritical fluid chromatography].
Lu F; Liu LL; Wu YT
Se Pu; 2000 Mar; 18(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 12541595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insights into chiral recognition mechanisms in supercritical fluid chromatography V. Effect of the nature and proportion of alcohol mobile phase modifier with amylose and cellulose tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) stationary phases.
Khater S; West C
J Chromatogr A; 2014 Dec; 1373():197-210. PubMed ID: 25482039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enantioselectivity of polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases in supercritical fluid chromatography using methanol-containing carbon dioxide mobile phases.
De Klerck K; Parewyck G; Mangelings D; Vander Heyden Y
J Chromatogr A; 2012 Dec; 1269():336-45. PubMed ID: 22909894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peak deformations in preparative supercritical fluid chromatography due to co-solvent adsorption.
Glenne E; Leek H; Klarqvist M; Samuelsson J; Fornstedt T
J Chromatogr A; 2016 Oct; 1468():200-208. PubMed ID: 27641721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A closer study of methanol adsorption and its impact on solute retentions in supercritical fluid chromatography.
Glenne E; Öhlén K; Leek H; Klarqvist M; Samuelsson J; Fornstedt T
J Chromatogr A; 2016 Apr; 1442():129-39. PubMed ID: 26979267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of an achiral supercritical fluid chromatography method with ultraviolet absorbance and mass spectrometric detection for impurity profiling of drug candidates. Part I: Optimization of mobile phase composition.
Lemasson E; Bertin S; Hennig P; Boiteux H; Lesellier E; West C
J Chromatogr A; 2015 Aug; 1408():217-26. PubMed ID: 26195034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of scale-up from analytical to preparative supercritical fluid chromatography.
Enmark M; Åsberg D; Leek H; Öhlén K; Klarqvist M; Samuelsson J; Fornstedt T
J Chromatogr A; 2015 Dec; 1425():280-6. PubMed ID: 26615709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of ultra-high performance supercritical fluid chromatography and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the analysis of pharmaceutical compounds.
Grand-Guillaume Perrenoud A; Veuthey JL; Guillarme D
J Chromatogr A; 2012 Nov; 1266():158-67. PubMed ID: 23092872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of robustness for supercritical fluid chromatography separation of peptides: Isocratic vs gradient mode.
Enmark M; Glenne E; Leśko M; Langborg Weinmann A; Leek T; Kaczmarski K; Klarqvist M; Samuelsson J; Fornstedt T
J Chromatogr A; 2018 Sep; 1568():177-187. PubMed ID: 30072233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
