343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28390145)
1. Non-ignorable missingness item response theory models for choice effects in examinee-selected items.
Liu CW; Wang WC
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 28390145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Item Response Theory Modeling for Examinee-selected Items with Rater Effect.
Liu CW; Qiu XL; Wang WC
Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Sep; 43(6):435-448. PubMed ID: 31452553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response.
Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():83-112. PubMed ID: 31709521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.
Park YS; Lee YS; Xing K
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():255. PubMed ID: 26941699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Examining Nonnormal Latent Variable Distributions for Non-Ignorable Missing Data.
Liu CW
Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 May; 45(3):159-177. PubMed ID: 33958834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unfolding IRT Models for Likert-Type Items With a Don't Know Option.
Liu CW; Wang WC
Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Oct; 40(7):517-533. PubMed ID: 29881067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robustness of Parameter Estimation to Assumptions of Normality in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
Wang C; Su S; Weiss DJ
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):403-418. PubMed ID: 29624093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new item response theory model to adjust data allowing examinee choice.
Pena CS; Costa MA; Braga Oliveira RP
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0191600. PubMed ID: 29389996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of non-ignorable missing and left-censored longitudinal data using a weighted random effects tobit model.
Sattar A; Weissfeld LA; Molenberghs G
Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(27):3167-80. PubMed ID: 21898524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parameter Recovery in Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models Under Complexity and Nonnormality.
Svetina D; Valdivia A; Underhill S; Dai S; Wang X
Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Oct; 41(7):530-544. PubMed ID: 29881104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian pattern-mixture models for dropout and intermittently missing data in longitudinal data analysis.
Blozis SA
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1953-1967. PubMed ID: 37221346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Empirical likelihood method for non-ignorable missing data problems.
Guan Z; Qin J
Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Jan; 23(1):113-135. PubMed ID: 27647436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robust Measurement via A Fused Latent and Graphical Item Response Theory Model.
Chen Y; Li X; Liu J; Ying Z
Psychometrika; 2018 Sep; 83(3):538-562. PubMed ID: 29532405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the Treatment of Missing Item Responses in Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: An Illustrative Simulation Study and a Case Study Using PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.
Robitzsch A
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ; 2021 Dec; 11(4):1653-1687. PubMed ID: 34940395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Two-Dimensional Multiple-Choice Model Accounting for Omissions.
Kreitchmann RS; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2540. PubMed ID: 30618961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling Test-Taking Non-effort in MIRT Models.
Liu Y; Li Z; Liu H; Luo F
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():145. PubMed ID: 30778317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiple-choice tests: polytomous IRT models misestimate item information.
García-Pérez MA
Span J Psychol; 2014 Dec; 17():E88. PubMed ID: 26054359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A copula model for repeated measurements with non-ignorable non-monotone missing outcome.
Shen C; Weissfeld L
Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(14):2427-40. PubMed ID: 16143999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simulation-based sensitivity analysis for non-ignorably missing data.
Yin P; Shi JQ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):289-308. PubMed ID: 28747095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayes Factor Covariance Testing in Item Response Models.
Fox JP; Mulder J; Sinharay S
Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):979-1006. PubMed ID: 28852944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
