BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28390253)

  • 1. The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.
    Leclère T; Lavandier M; Deroche MLD
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():1-10. PubMed ID: 28390253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Roles of the target and masker fundamental frequencies in voice segregation.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF; Chatterjee M; Limb CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1225. PubMed ID: 25190396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: evidence for harmonic cancellation.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2855-65. PubMed ID: 22087914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A dynamic binaural harmonic-cancellation model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker varying in intonation, temporal envelope, and location.
    Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108535. PubMed ID: 35654633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of periodicity in perceiving speech in quiet and in background noise.
    Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3586-99. PubMed ID: 26723315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of spatial configuration and fundamental frequency on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions in the ipsilateral horizontal plane and median planea).
    Yao D; Zhao J; Wang L; Shang Z; Gu J; Wang Y; Jia M; Li J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 May; 155(5):2934-2947. PubMed ID: 38717201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the role of harmonic cancellation in speech-on-speech masking.
    Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108562. PubMed ID: 35768309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informational masking and the effects of differences in fundamental frequency and fundamental-frequency contour on phonetic integration in a formant ensemble.
    Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():295-303. PubMed ID: 27815130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of masker predictability in the cocktail party problem.
    Jones GL; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3818-30. PubMed ID: 19206808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A harmonic-cancellation-based model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker.
    Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Nov; 148(5):3246. PubMed ID: 33261378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental Effects in Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.
    Flaherty MM; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):927-937. PubMed ID: 30334835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Energetic and Informational Components of Speech-on-Speech Masking in Binaural Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort.
    Rennies J; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519854597. PubMed ID: 31172880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.
    Shen Y; Manzano NK; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3613-24. PubMed ID: 26723318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution of envelope periodicity to release from speech-on-speech masking.
    Christiansen C; MacDonald EN; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2197-204. PubMed ID: 23967949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of pitch and harmonic cancellation when listening to speech in harmonic background sounds.
    Guest DR; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):3011. PubMed ID: 31153349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informational masking of speech produced by speech-like sounds without linguistic content.
    Chen J; Li H; Li L; Wu X; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2914-26. PubMed ID: 22501069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.