These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28390253)

  • 21. The effect of spatial separation in distance on the intelligibility of speech in rooms.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):757-67. PubMed ID: 25698010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The multiple contributions of interaural differences to improved speech intelligibility in multitalker scenarios.
    Schoenmaker E; Brand T; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2589. PubMed ID: 27250153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of F0 contour on the intelligibility of speech in the presence of interfering sounds for Mandarin Chinese.
    Chen J; Yang H; Wu X; Moore BCJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):864. PubMed ID: 29495712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Phase effects on the masking of speech by harmonic complexes: variations with level.
    Green T; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2876-83. PubMed ID: 24116424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of fundamental frequency contours in the perception of speech against interfering speech.
    Binns C; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1765. PubMed ID: 17927436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contribution of temporal fine structure information and fundamental frequency separation to intelligibility in a competing-speaker paradigm.
    Jackson HM; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2421-30. PubMed ID: 23556607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Phase effects in masking by harmonic complexes: detection of bands of speech-shaped noise.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF; Chatterjee M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):2726-36. PubMed ID: 25373972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
    Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech Segregation in Active Middle Ear Stimulation: Masking Release With Changing Fundamental Frequency.
    Auinger AB; Liepins R; Kaider A; Vyskocil E; Riss D; Arnoldner C
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):709-717. PubMed ID: 33369941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of target/masker fundamental frequency contour similarity on masked-speech recognition.
    Calandruccio L; Wasiuk PA; Buss E; Leibold LJ; Kong J; Holmes A; Oleson J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Aug; 146(2):1065. PubMed ID: 31472562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of a short-time version of the Equalization-Cancellation model to speech intelligibility experiments with speech maskers.
    Wan R; Durlach NI; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):768-76. PubMed ID: 25096111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intelligibility in speech maskers with a binaural cochlear implant sound coding strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Gorospe JM; Ruiz SSC; Benito F; Wilson BS
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():134-137. PubMed ID: 28188882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Ihlefeld A; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.
    Allen K; Alais D; Shinn-Cunningham B; Carlile S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2043-53. PubMed ID: 21973359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does it take older adults longer than younger adults to perceptually segregate a speech target from a background masker?
    Ben-David BM; Tse VY; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):55-63. PubMed ID: 22609772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
    Bernstein JG; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial unmasking of birdsong in human listeners: energetic and informational factors.
    Best V; Ozmeral E; Gallun FJ; Sen K; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Dec; 118(6):3766-73. PubMed ID: 16419821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of a consistent target or masker voice on target speech intelligibility in two- and three-talker mixtures.
    Samson F; Johnsrude IS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1037-46. PubMed ID: 27036241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intelligibility of whispered speech in stationary and modulated noise maskers.
    Freyman RL; Griffin AM; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2514-23. PubMed ID: 23039445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.