These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28390253)

  • 41. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
    Cao S; Li L; Wu X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.
    Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1627-37. PubMed ID: 19045654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
    Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.
    Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2093. PubMed ID: 28372135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of F0 contour on perception of Mandarin Chinese speech against masking.
    Wu M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209976. PubMed ID: 30605452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of spatial and temporal integration of a single early reflection on speech intelligibility.
    Warzybok A; Rennies J; Brand T; Doclo S; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):269-82. PubMed ID: 23297901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Emotionally conditioning the target-speech voice enhances recognition of the target speech under "cocktail-party" listening conditions.
    Lu L; Bao X; Chen J; Qu T; Wu X; Li L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):871-883. PubMed ID: 29473143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Detection and F0 discrimination of harmonic complex tones in the presence of competing tones or noise.
    Micheyl C; Bernstein JG; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Sep; 120(3):1493-505. PubMed ID: 17004471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.
    Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Contribution of binaural masking release to improved speech intelligibility for different masker types.
    Sutojo S; van de Par S; Schoenmaker E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 51(5):1339-1352. PubMed ID: 29855098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of reverberation and masker fluctuations on binaural unmasking of speech.
    George EL; Festen JM; Goverts ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1581-91. PubMed ID: 22978887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of fundamental frequency contour similarity on multi-talker listening in older and younger adults.
    Wasiuk PA; Lavandier M; Buss E; Oleson J; Calandruccio L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Dec; 148(6):3527. PubMed ID: 33379934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A metric for predicting binaural speech intelligibility in stationary noise and competing speech maskers.
    Tang Y; Cooke M; Fazenda BM; Cox TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1858. PubMed ID: 27914424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of reverberation on perceptual segregation of competing voices.
    Culling JF; Hodder KI; Toh CY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Nov; 114(5):2871-6. PubMed ID: 14650021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. On the near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1967-77. PubMed ID: 25234995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Phase effects in masking by harmonic complexes: speech recognition.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF; Chatterjee M
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():54-62. PubMed ID: 24076425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of linear and nonlinear speech rate changes on speech intelligibility in stationary and fluctuating maskers.
    Cooke M; Aubanel V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4126. PubMed ID: 28618803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.