These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28390281)

  • 1. Analysis of MSW full-scale facilities based on anaerobic digestion and/or composting using respiration indices as performance indicators.
    Colón J; Ponsá S; Álvarez C; Vinot M; Lafuente FJ; Gabriel D; Sánchez A
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Jul; 236():87-96. PubMed ID: 28390281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmental impact of rejected materials generated in organic fraction of municipal solid waste anaerobic digestion plants: Comparison of wet and dry process layout.
    Colazo AB; Sánchez A; Font X; Colón J
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():84-97. PubMed ID: 26123979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste allows landfill impact reduction saving waste energy content.
    Scaglia B; Salati S; Di Gregorio A; Carrera A; Tambone F; Adani F
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Sep; 143():131-8. PubMed ID: 23792663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monitoring the performances of a real scale municipal solid waste composting and a biodrying facility using respiration activity indices.
    Evangelou A; Gerassimidou S; Mavrakis N; Komilis D
    Environ Monit Assess; 2016 May; 188(5):302. PubMed ID: 27098520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementation of waste-to-energy options in landfill-dominated countries: Economic evaluation and GHG impact.
    Aracil C; Haro P; Fuentes-Cano D; Gómez-Barea A
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jun; 76():443-456. PubMed ID: 29610061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A technical, economic and environmental comparison of composting and anaerobic digestion of biodegradable municipal waste.
    Murphy JD; Power NM
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2006; 41(5):865-79. PubMed ID: 16702064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A complete mass balance of a complex combined anaerobic/aerobic municipal source-separated waste treatment plant.
    Pognani M; Barrena R; Font X; Sánchez A
    Waste Manag; 2012 May; 32(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 22261421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monitoring the organic matter properties in a combined anaerobic/aerobic full-scale municipal source-separated waste treatment plant.
    Pognani M; Barrena R; Font X; Scaglia B; Adani F; Sánchez A
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Sep; 101(17):6873-7. PubMed ID: 20385487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In search of a reliable technique for the determination of the biological stability of the organic matter in the mechanical-biological treated waste.
    Barrena R; d'Imporzano G; Ponsá S; Gea T; Artola A; Vázquez F; Sánchez A; Adani F
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Mar; 162(2-3):1065-72. PubMed ID: 18606494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic stability indices through a MSW biological treatment process.
    Ponsá S; Gea T; Alerm L; Cerezo J; Sánchez A
    Waste Manag; 2008 Dec; 28(12):2735-42. PubMed ID: 18262404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of municipal solid waste compost as a plant growing media component, by applying mixture design.
    Moldes A; Cendón Y; Barral MT
    Bioresour Technol; 2007 Nov; 98(16):3069-75. PubMed ID: 17157003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of air flowrate on the dynamic respiration activity of the raw organic fraction of municipal solid wastes.
    Evangelou A; Chintzios V; Komilis D; Sánchez A
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Jan; 224():748-752. PubMed ID: 27923609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic visualisation of municipal waste management performance in the EU using Ternary Diagram method.
    Pomberger R; Sarc R; Lorber KE
    Waste Manag; 2017 Mar; 61():558-571. PubMed ID: 28161336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of Waste Stability Indices for Mechanical⁻Biological Waste Treatment and Composting Plants.
    Jędrczak A; Suchowska-Kisielewicz M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Nov; 15(11):. PubMed ID: 30463245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sustainable mechanical biological treatment of solid waste in urbanized areas with low recycling rates.
    Trulli E; Ferronato N; Torretta V; Piscitelli M; Masi S; Mancini I
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jan; 71():556-564. PubMed ID: 29066137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study and assessment of segregated biowaste composting: The case study of Attica municipalities.
    Malamis D; Bourka A; Stamatopoulou Ε; Moustakas K; Skiadi O; Loizidou M
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 203(Pt 2):664-669. PubMed ID: 27784578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of waste processing in the MBT system.
    Połomka J; Jędrczak A
    Waste Manag; 2019 Aug; 96():9-14. PubMed ID: 31376974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence assessment of a lab-scale ripening process on the quality of mechanically-biologically treated MSW for possible recovery.
    Di Lonardo MC; Binner E; Lombardi F
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():50-60. PubMed ID: 26074212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical-biological treatment of municipal solid waste: Case study of 100 TPD Goa plant, India.
    Tyagi VK; Kapoor A; Arora P; Banu JR; Das S; Pipesh S; Kazmi AA
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Aug; 292():112741. PubMed ID: 34015615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compostability of bioplastic packaging materials: an overview.
    Kale G; Kijchavengkul T; Auras R; Rubino M; Selke SE; Singh SP
    Macromol Biosci; 2007 Mar; 7(3):255-77. PubMed ID: 17370278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.