BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28390451)

  • 1. A Comparative Volumetric Evaluation of Four Obturating Techniques in Primary Teeth Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Singh A; Gupta N; Agarwal N; Kumar D; Anand A
    Pediatr Dent; 2017 Mar; 39(2):11-16. PubMed ID: 28390451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Volumetric Evaluation of Different Obturation Techniques in Primary Teeth Using Spiral Computed Tomography.
    Nagaveni NB; Yadav S; Poornima P; Reddy VS; Roshan NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 28052215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Volumetric evaluation of various obturation techniques in primary teeth using cone beam computed tomography - An
    Nagaveni NB; Yadav S; Poornima P; Bharath KP; Mathew MG; Naveen Kumar PG
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(3):244-248. PubMed ID: 28762351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparative Analysis of Voids and Sealing Ability of Different Obturating Techniques Using CBCT.
    Singh A; Anand S; Prakash R; Ahmed A; Dhawan J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Oct; 23(10):1021-1025. PubMed ID: 37073916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Different Root Canal Obturation Methods in Primary Teeth Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography.
    Singh R; Chaudhary S; Manuja N; Chaitra TR; Sinha AA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(5):462-9. PubMed ID: 26551371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Volumetric analysis of root canal fillings in primary teeth using spiral computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Asokan S; Sooriaprakas C; Raghu V; Bairavi R
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2012; 79(2):46-8. PubMed ID: 22828756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical efficacy of various root canal obturating methods in primary teeth: a comparative study.
    Grover R; Mehra M; Pandit IK; Srivastava N; Gugnani N; Gupta M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 23758458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative volumetric analysis of three different obturating materials in primary molars under cone beam computed tomography: an in-vitro study.
    Pandey A; K P; Avinash A; Pathivada L; Kumar B; Kapur D
    Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2023 Feb; 72(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 36197278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-Dimensional Measurement of Obturation Quality of Bioceramic Materials in Filling Artificial Internal Root Resorption Cavities Using Different Obturation Techniques: An In Vitro Comparative Study.
    Sharki AM; Ali AH
    J Endod; 2024 Jul; 50(7):997-1003. PubMed ID: 38588977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of three obturation techniques in primary incisors using digital intra-oral receptor and C.B.C.T-an in vitro study.
    Akhil JEJ; Prashant B; Shashibushan KK
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):689-696. PubMed ID: 29744724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 'Volumetric analysis of hand and rotary root canal instrumentation and filling in primary teeth using Spiral Computed Tomography' - an invitro study.
    Poornima P; Disha P; Nagaveni NB; Roopa KB; Bharath KP; Neena IE
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 May; 26(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 26146902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Volumetric analysis of root fillings using spiral computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Anbu R; Nandini S; Velmurugan N
    Int Endod J; 2010 Jan; 43(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 19891718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of Volumetric Distortion Artifact in Filled Root Canals Using Different Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Devices.
    Celikten B; Jacobs R; deFaria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Nicolielo LFP; Orhan K
    J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1517-1521. PubMed ID: 28673491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Micro-Computed Tomography Study of Filling Material Removal from Oval-shaped Canals by Using Rotary, Reciprocating, and Adaptive Motion Systems.
    Crozeta BM; Silva-Sousa YT; Leoni GB; Mazzi-Chaves JF; Fantinato T; Baratto-Filho F; Sousa-Neto MD
    J Endod; 2016 May; 42(5):793-7. PubMed ID: 26987688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative Evaluation of Three Obturating Techniques in Primary Molars: An
    Ellana Jermiah J; Rao A; Srikant N; Rao A; Suprabha BS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 43(6):372-375. PubMed ID: 31657988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Evaluation of Four Different Obturating Techniques in Primary Teeth Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: An
    Ali SM; Mukthineni S; Sankar AS; Enuganti S; Kundeti SS; Yalamanchili S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023; 16(2):218-222. PubMed ID: 37519979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Volumetric analysis of root filling with cold lateral compaction, Obtura II, Thermafil, and Calamus using spiral computerized tomography: An
    Jindal D; Sharma M; Raisingani D; Swarnkar A; Pant M; Mathur R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(2):175-180. PubMed ID: 28611328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Root Canal Filling in Primary Teeth by Volumetric Analysis:
    Sijeria P; Bhartia R; Swamy Kv N; Kulkarni S; Singla S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2018; 11(5):386-392. PubMed ID: 30787551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro comparison of three delivery techniques for obturation of root canals in primary molars.
    Walia T; Ghanbari AH; Mathew S; Ziadlou AH
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2017 Feb; 18(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 27885586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of three radiographic methods in the outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment: a five-year follow-up.
    Fernández R; Cadavid D; Zapata SM; Alvarez LG; Restrepo FA
    J Endod; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1097-103. PubMed ID: 23953279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.