226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28390859)
1. Developing species sensitivity distributions for metallic nanomaterials considering the characteristics of nanomaterials, experimental conditions, and different types of endpoints.
Chen G; Peijnenburg WJGM; Xiao Y; Vijver MG
Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Feb; 112():563-570. PubMed ID: 28390859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Species sensitivity distributions for engineered nanomaterials.
Garner KL; Suh S; Lenihan HS; Keller AA
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(9):5753-9. PubMed ID: 25875138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk.
Cohen Y; Rallo R; Liu R; Liu HH
Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):802-12. PubMed ID: 23138971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current Knowledge on the Use of Computational Toxicology in Hazard Assessment of Metallic Engineered Nanomaterials.
Chen G; Peijnenburg W; Xiao Y; Vijver MG
Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Jul; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 28704975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of species sensitivity distribution modeling approaches for environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials - A case study for silver and titanium dioxide representative materials.
Sørensen SN; Wigger H; Zabeo A; Semenzin E; Hristozov D; Nowack B; Spurgeon DJ; Baun A
Aquat Toxicol; 2020 Aug; 225():105543. PubMed ID: 32585540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ecophysiological perspectives on engineered nanomaterial toxicity in fish and crustaceans.
Callaghan NI; MacCormack TJ
Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Mar; 193():30-41. PubMed ID: 28017784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of nanosilver on various DNA lesions and HPRT gene mutations - effects of charge and surface coating.
Huk A; Izak-Nau E; El Yamani N; Uggerud H; Vadset M; Zasonska B; Duschl A; Dusinska M
Part Fibre Toxicol; 2015 Jul; 12():25. PubMed ID: 26204901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implications of handling practices on the ecotoxic profile of alumina nanoparticles towards the bacteria Vibrio fischeri.
Tsiridis V; Petala M; Koukiotis C; Darakas E
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2017 Jan; 52(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 27610930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanisms involved in the impact of engineered nanomaterials on the joint toxicity with environmental pollutants.
Liu Y; Nie Y; Wang J; Wang J; Wang X; Chen S; Zhao G; Wu L; Xu A
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Oct; 162():92-102. PubMed ID: 29990744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and application of the SSD approach in scientific case studies for ecological risk assessment.
Del Signore A; Hendriks AJ; Lenders HJ; Leuven RS; Breure AM
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2149-61. PubMed ID: 27144499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aquatic acute species sensitivity distributions of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles.
Adam N; Schmitt C; De Bruyn L; Knapen D; Blust R
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Sep; 526():233-42. PubMed ID: 25933293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ecotoxicological impact of engineered nanomaterials in bivalve molluscs: An overview.
Rocha TL; Gomes T; Sousa VS; Mestre NC; Bebianno MJ
Mar Environ Res; 2015 Oct; 111():74-88. PubMed ID: 26152602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Species sensitivity weighted distribution for ecological risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: the n-TiO2 case study.
Semenzin E; Lanzellotto E; Hristozov D; Critto A; Zabeo A; Giubilato E; Marcomini A
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2644-59. PubMed ID: 26058704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of engineered nanomaterials (Ag, CeO
Loosli F; Wang J; Sikder M; Afshinnia K; Baalousha M
Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 715():136927. PubMed ID: 32007892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ecotoxicity test methods for engineered nanomaterials: practical experiences and recommendations from the bench.
Handy RD; Cornelis G; Fernandes T; Tsyusko O; Decho A; Sabo-Attwood T; Metcalfe C; Steevens JA; Klaine SJ; Koelmans AA; Horne N
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Jan; 31(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 22002667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nanomaterials and the environment: a review for the biennium 2008-2010.
Peralta-Videa JR; Zhao L; Lopez-Moreno ML; de la Rosa G; Hong J; Gardea-Torresdey JL
J Hazard Mater; 2011 Feb; 186(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 21134718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. NanoE-Tox: New and in-depth database concerning ecotoxicity of nanomaterials.
Juganson K; Ivask A; Blinova I; Mortimer M; Kahru A
Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2015; 6():1788-804. PubMed ID: 26425431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fish cell lines as a tool for the ecotoxicity assessment and ranking of engineered nanomaterials.
Bermejo-Nogales A; Fernández-Cruz ML; Navas JM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Nov; 90():297-307. PubMed ID: 28966106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Form-Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano-Ag, Nano-TiO
Hong H; Adam V; Nowack B
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Sep; 40(9):2629-2639. PubMed ID: 34171135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flows of engineered nanomaterials through the recycling process in Switzerland.
Caballero-Guzman A; Sun T; Nowack B
Waste Manag; 2015 Feb; 36():33-43. PubMed ID: 25524750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
