198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28390945)
1. Intraoperative Factors that Predict the Successful Placement of Essure Microinserts.
Arthuis CJ; Simon EG; Hébert T; Marret H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 28390945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Confirmation of Essure microinsert tubal coil placement with conventional and volume-contrast imaging three-dimensional ultrasound.
Thiel JA; Suchet IB; Lortie K
Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 16084897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of three-dimensional ultrasound examination classification to check the position of the tubal sterilization microinsert.
Legendre G; Gervaise A; Levaillant JM; Faivre E; Deffieux X; Fernandez H
Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2732-5. PubMed ID: 20451183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
Zizolfi B; Lazzeri L; Franchini M; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Nappi C; Piccione E; Exacoustos C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incorrect position of Essure microinserts 3 months after successful bilateral placement.
Gerritse MB; Veersema S; Timmermans A; Brölmann HA
Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):930.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18945426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound assessment of the Essure contraceptive devices: is three-dimensional ultrasound really needed?
Paladini D; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Coppola C; Zizolfi B; Pastore G; Nappi C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 25241073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of the interpretation of coronal 3D ultrasound view of the uterus to evaluate the position of Essure
Capmas P; Letendre I; Levaillant JM; Fuchs F; Panel P; Chambon G; Villefranque V; Levy-Zauberman Y; Fernandez H
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Sep; 46(7):571-573. PubMed ID: 28676451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discordant relationship between Essure microinsert position and tubal occlusion.
Hou MY
BMJ Case Rep; 2016 Jul; 2016():. PubMed ID: 27466315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography for Assessment of the Efficacy of Essure Hysteroscopic Sterilization.
Rosič M; Žegura B; Vadnjal Đonlagić S
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1929-1935. PubMed ID: 29344973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Algorithm of Transvaginal Ultrasound and/or Hysterosalpingogram for Confirmation Testing at 3 Months after Essure Placement.
Vleugels M; Cheng RF; Goldstein J; Bangerter K; Connor V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1128-1135. PubMed ID: 28669895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast infusion sonography to assess microinsert placement and tubal occlusion after Essure.
Connor VF
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jun; 85(6):1791-3. PubMed ID: 16650420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Essure microinsert imaging: does abnormal shape on ultrasound predict complications on HSG?
VanBuren WM; Suchet IB; Thiel JA; Karreman E
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Dec; 41(12):2350-2358. PubMed ID: 27022912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hysteroscopic Sterilization Device Follow-Up Rate: Hysterosalpingogram Versus Transvaginal Ultrasound.
Jeirath N; Basinski CM; Hammond MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 29289623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technique for the Laparoscopic Removal of Essure Microinserts.
Mahmoud MS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):472. PubMed ID: 26776673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Follow-up of successful bilateral placement of Essure microinserts with ultrasound.
Veersema S; Vleugels MP; Timmermans A; Brölmann HA
Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1733-6. PubMed ID: 16359973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pre-hysterectomy assessment of immediate tubal occlusion with the third-generation ESSURE insert (ESS505).
Thiel J; Rattray D; Cher DJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1055-60. PubMed ID: 24861649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Essure microinsert hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: eight-years follow-up results.
Sakinci M; Aksu T; Kuru O; Ozekinci M; Sanhal C
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2015; 42(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 25864287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: an evidence-based analysis.
McMartin K
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2013; 13(21):1-35. PubMed ID: 24228084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Pilot Study Comparing 2- and 3-dimensional Ultrasound Imaging for Confirmation of Essure Fallopian Tube Pregnancy Prevention Implants.
Godfroy M; Lopes P; Le Vaillant C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1117-1124. PubMed ID: 30428382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microinsert nonincisional hysteroscopic sterilization.
Cooper JM; Carignan CS; Cher D; Kerin JF;
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 102(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 12850608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
