These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28391622)
41. Tono-Pen XL calibration curves for cats, cows and sheep. Passaglia CL; Guo X; Chen J; Troy JB Vet Ophthalmol; 2004; 7(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 15200622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The Proview phosphene tonometer fails to measure ocular pressure accurately in clinical practice. Alvarez TL; Gollance SA; Thomas GA; Greene RJ; Marchetto PM; Moore EJ; Realini T; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Lama P; Fechtner RD Ophthalmology; 2004 Jun; 111(6):1077-85. PubMed ID: 15177956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Agreement and reproducibility of Tono-Pen XL tip covered with ocufilm and fingertip of surgical glove in intra-ocular pressure measurement. Sayawat N; Duangnumsawang D J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Apr; 95 Suppl 4():S102-6. PubMed ID: 22696861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The effect of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses on the measurement of intraocular pressure with rebound tonometry. Zeri F; Calcatelli P; Donini B; Lupelli L; Zarrilli L; Swann PG Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2011 Dec; 34(6):260-5. PubMed ID: 21636312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of a rebound tonometer with an applanation tonometer in dogs with glaucoma. Slack JM; Stiles J; Moore GE Vet Rec; 2012 Oct; 171(15):373. PubMed ID: 22915681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Intraocular pressure in Lewis rats. Mermoud A; Baerveldt G; Minckler DS; Lee MB; Rao NA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Apr; 35(5):2455-60. PubMed ID: 8163335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of the Tono-Pen and Goldmann tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma. Horowitz GS; Byles J; Lee J; D'Este C Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 32(6):584-9. PubMed ID: 15575828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of three tonometers for measuring intraocular pressure in rabbits. Abrams LS; Vitale S; Jampel HD Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Apr; 37(5):940-4. PubMed ID: 8603880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Tono-Pen tonometer and corneal thickness. Mok KH; Wong CS; Lee VW Eye (Lond); 1999; 13 ( Pt 1)():35-7. PubMed ID: 10396381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Tonopen versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for detecting restrictive thyroid eye disease. Rahman I; Cannon PS; Sadiq SA Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010; 26(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 20090483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using rebound (TonoVet McDonald JE; Knollinger AM; Dustin Dees D; MacLaren NE Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 20(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 27111099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability. Tonnu PA; Ho T; Sharma K; White E; Bunce C; Garway-Heath D Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):847-50. PubMed ID: 15965164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements in dogs using two different tonometers and plano therapeutic soft contact lenses. Ahn JT; Jeong MB; Park YW; Kim SE; Ahn JS; Lee YR; Lee ER; Seo K Vet Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 15 Suppl 1():83-8. PubMed ID: 22192568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: an in vitro model. Neuburger M; Maier P; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; F Jordan J J Glaucoma; 2013 Sep; 22(7):584-90. PubMed ID: 22366704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of Tono-Pen AVIA intraocular pressure measurements performed at limbus with central corneal Tono-Pen AVIA intraocular pressure. Sharma R; Majumdar S; Sobti A; Arora T; Agarwal T; Dada T Cornea; 2013 Jul; 32(7):943-6. PubMed ID: 23328700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The measurement of intraocular pressure over positive soft contact lenses by rebound tonometry. Zeri F; De Cusatis M; Lupelli L; Swann PG J Optom; 2016; 9(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 26499996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The Sensimed Triggerfish contact lens sensor: efficacy, safety, and patient perspectives. Dunbar GE; Shen BY; Aref AA Clin Ophthalmol; 2017; 11():875-882. PubMed ID: 28507427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement with Scheimpflug-based noncontact tonometer with and without hydrogel contact lenses. Kumar M; Shetty R; Jayadev C; Dutta D; Nicolsan MD; Nagaraj S; Kumar RS Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 63(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 26044471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Estimation of 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Peak Timing and Variation Using a Contact Lens Sensor. Liu JH; Mansouri K; Weinreb RN PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129529. PubMed ID: 26076472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]