These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28391769)

  • 1. Information presentation compatibility in a simple digital control panel design: eye-tracking study.
    Michalski R
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2018 Sep; 24(3):395-405. PubMed ID: 28391769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital, analogue, or redundant speedometers for truck driving: Impact on visual distraction, efficiency and usability.
    François M; Crave P; Osiurak F; Fort A; Navarro J
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():12-22. PubMed ID: 28802430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative evaluation of in-vehicle side view displays layouts in critical lane changing situation.
    Beck D; Lee M; Park W
    Ergonomics; 2017 Dec; 60(12):1682-1691. PubMed ID: 28617652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applicability of location compatibility to the arrangement of display and control in human - vehicle systems: comparison between young and older adults.
    Murata A; Moriwaka M
    Ergonomics; 2007 Jan; 50(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 17178654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of a simulated head-up display speedometer on perceptual task performance.
    Sojourner RJ; Antin JF
    Hum Factors; 1990 Jun; 32(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 2258179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of navigation display clutter on performance and attention allocation in presentation- and simulator-based driving experiments.
    Pankok C; Kaber D
    Appl Ergon; 2018 May; 69():136-145. PubMed ID: 29477321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An integrated measure of display clutter based on feature content, user knowledge and attention allocation factors.
    Pankok C; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 2018 May; 61(5):682-696. PubMed ID: 29099336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception and eye movements in simulated traffic situations.
    Luoma J
    Acta Ophthalmol Suppl; 1984; 161():128-34. PubMed ID: 6328843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance.
    Liu YC; Jhuang JW
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a motion fidelity criterion with visual scene changes.
    Schroeder JA; Chung WW; Hess RA
    J Aircr; 2000; 37(4):580-7. PubMed ID: 11543542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compensatory eye and head movements of patients with homonymous hemianopia in the naturalistic setting of a driving simulation.
    Bahnemann M; Hamel J; De Beukelaer S; Ohl S; Kehrer S; Audebert H; Kraft A; Brandt SA
    J Neurol; 2015 Feb; 262(2):316-25. PubMed ID: 25381457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance.
    Chisholm SL; Caird JK; Lockhart J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):704-13. PubMed ID: 18329424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Spatial and temporal characteristic of eye movement in human-computer interface design].
    Shen MW; Feng CZ; Su H
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2003 Aug; 16(4):304-6. PubMed ID: 14594043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driving and side task performance: the effects of display clutter, separation, and modality.
    Horrey WJ; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):611-24. PubMed ID: 15709324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of secondary task cognitive processing demand on driving performance.
    Blanco M; Biever WJ; Gallagher JP; Dingus TA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):895-906. PubMed ID: 16584702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tracking and discrete dual task performance for different visual spatial stimulus-response mappings with focal and ambient vision.
    Tsang SNH; Chan AHS
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():39-49. PubMed ID: 29122199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of four user interface concepts on visual scan pattern similarity and information foraging in a complex decision making task.
    Starke SD; Baber C
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():6-17. PubMed ID: 29866327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Driver distraction and performance effects of highway logo sign design.
    Zhang Y; Harris E; Rogers M; Kaber D; Hummer J; Rasdorf W; Hu J
    Appl Ergon; 2013 May; 44(3):472-9. PubMed ID: 23141432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A link between attentional function, effective eye movements, and driving ability.
    Mackenzie AK; Harris JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):381-394. PubMed ID: 27893270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of visual and cognitive distractions on operational and tactical driving behaviors.
    Zhang Y; Kaber DB; Rogers M; Liang Y; Gangakhedkar S
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):592-604. PubMed ID: 24930178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.