BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28391819)

  • 1. Automatic gender determination from 3D digital maxillary tooth plaster models based on the random forest algorithm and discrete cosine transform.
    Akkoç B; Arslan A; Kök H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():59-65. PubMed ID: 28391819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gray level co-occurrence and random forest algorithm-based gender determination with maxillary tooth plaster images.
    Akkoç B; Arslan A; Kök H
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Jun; 73():102-7. PubMed ID: 27104495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic detection and classification of teeth in CT data.
    Duy NT; Lamecker H; Kainmueller D; Zachow S
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 1):609-16. PubMed ID: 23285602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro.
    Lin X; Chen T; Liu J; Jiang T; Yu D; Shen SG
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25300890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional reconstruction of teeth and jaws based on segmentation of CT images using watershed transformation.
    Naumovich SS; Naumovich SA; Goncharenko VG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140313. PubMed ID: 25564886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tooth model reconstruction based upon data fusion for orthodontic treatment simulation.
    Yau HT; Yang TJ; Chen YC
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 May; 48():8-16. PubMed ID: 24631784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A preliminary study for determination of three-dimensional root apex position of the maxillary teeth using camera calibration technology.
    Oh HJ; Yang IH; Baek SH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(1):20150186. PubMed ID: 26317151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual tooth segmentation from CT images scanned with contacts of maxillary and mandible teeth.
    Xia Z; Gan Y; Chang L; Xiong J; Zhao Q
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Jan; 138():1-12. PubMed ID: 27886708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of a three-dimensional dentition model digitized from an interocclusal record using a non-contact surface scanner.
    Kihara T; Yoshimi Y; Taji T; Murayama T; Tanimoto K; Nikawa H
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Aug; 38(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 26378085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tooth segmentation of dental study models using range images.
    Kondo T; Ong SH; Foong KW
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar; 23(3):350-62. PubMed ID: 15027528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integration accuracy of digital dental models and 3-dimensional computerized tomography images by sequential point- and surface-based markerless registration.
    Kim BC; Lee CE; Park W; Kang SH; Zhengguo P; Yi CK; Lee SH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 20591700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
    Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D exemplar-based random walks for tooth segmentation from cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Pei Y; Ai X; Zha H; Xu T; Ma G
    Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5040. PubMed ID: 27587034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tooth and Alveolar Bone Segmentation From Dental Computed Tomography Images.
    Gan Y; Xia Z; Xiong J; Li G; Zhao Q
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2018 Jan; 22(1):196-204. PubMed ID: 28574371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of regular dental cast artifacts on the 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental models.
    Henninger E; Vasilakos G; Halazonetis D; Gkantidis N
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10501. PubMed ID: 31324833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic teeth axes calculation for well-aligned teeth using cost profile analysis along teeth center arch.
    Kim G; Lee J; Seo J; Lee W; Shin YG; Kim B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Apr; 59(4):1145-54. PubMed ID: 22287231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional lung tumor segmentation from x-ray computed tomography using sparse field active models.
    Awad J; Owrangi A; Villemaire L; O'Riordan E; Parraga G; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):851-65. PubMed ID: 22320795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Registration accuracy in the integration of laser-scanned dental images into maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Noh H; Nabha W; Cho JH; Hwang HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 21967948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.