BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28391971)

  • 1. Do 72-Hour Waiting Periods and Two-Visit Requirements for Abortion Affect Women's Certainty? A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Roberts SCM; Belusa E; Turok DK; Combellick S; Ralph L
    Womens Health Issues; 2017; 27(4):400-406. PubMed ID: 28391971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Utah's 72-Hour Waiting Period for Abortion: Experiences Among a Clinic-Based Sample of Women.
    Roberts SC; Turok DK; Belusa E; Combellick S; Upadhyay UD
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2016 Dec; 48(4):179-187. PubMed ID: 27010515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Longest Wait: Examining the Impact of Utah's 72-Hour Waiting Period for Abortion.
    Sanders JN; Conway H; Jacobson J; Torres L; Turok DK
    Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(5):483-7. PubMed ID: 27502901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring decisional certainty among women seeking abortion.
    Ralph LJ; Foster DG; Kimport K; Turok D; Roberts SCM
    Contraception; 2017 Mar; 95(3):269-278. PubMed ID: 27745910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion Waiting Periods and Decision Certainty Among People Searching Online for Abortion Care.
    Jovel I; Cartwright AF; Ralph L; Upadhyay UD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 137(4):597-605. PubMed ID: 33706354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion Patients' Experience and Perceptions of Waiting Periods: Survey Evidence before Arizona's Two-visit 24-hour Mandatory Waiting Period Law.
    Karasek D; Roberts SC; Weitz TA
    Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 26626710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mandatory pre-abortion counseling is a barrier to accessing safe abortion services.
    Bain LE
    Pan Afr Med J; 2020; 35():80. PubMed ID: 32537083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the impact of a mandatory pre-abortion ultrasound viewing law: A mixed methods study.
    Upadhyay UD; Kimport K; Belusa EKO; Johns NE; Laube DW; Roberts SCM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0178871. PubMed ID: 28746377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Women's Experiences Using Telemedicine to Attend Abortion Information Visits in Utah: A Qualitative Study.
    Ehrenreich K; Kaller S; Raifman S; Grossman D
    Womens Health Issues; 2019; 29(5):407-413. PubMed ID: 31109883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interruption of pregnancy: motives, attitudes and contraceptive use. Interviews before abortion, at a family planning clinic, Rome.
    Bengtsson Agostino M; Wahlberg V
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1991; 32(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 1756991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Impact of a 72-hour Waiting Period on Women's Access to Abortion Care at a Hospital-Based Clinic in North Carolina.
    Morse JE; Charm S; Bryant A; Ramesh S; Krashin J; Stuart GS
    N C Med J; 2018; 79(4):205-209. PubMed ID: 29991607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women's Mental Health and Well-being 5 Years After Receiving or Being Denied an Abortion: A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study.
    Biggs MA; Upadhyay UD; McCulloch CE; Foster DG
    JAMA Psychiatry; 2017 Feb; 74(2):169-178. PubMed ID: 27973641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The abortion decision: reasons and ambivalence.
    Allanson S; Astbury J
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Sep; 16(3):123-36. PubMed ID: 8528379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experiences Accessing Abortion Care in Alabama among Women Traveling for Services.
    White K; deMartelly V; Grossman D; Turan JM
    Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 26897655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forced counseling, delays continue as mainstays of antiabortion agenda.
    Saul R
    State Reprod Health Monit; 1997 Jun; 8(2):8-9. PubMed ID: 12348028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Travel for Abortion Services in Alabama and Delays Obtaining Care.
    White K; Turan JM; Grossman D
    Womens Health Issues; 2017; 27(5):523-529. PubMed ID: 28506545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mandatory waiting periods and biased abortion counseling in Central and Eastern Europe.
    Hoctor L; Lamačková A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Nov; 139(2):253-258. PubMed ID: 28752546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of abortion counseling receipt and helpfulness in the United States.
    Gould H; Foster DG; Perrucci AC; Barar RE; Roberts SC
    Womens Health Issues; 2013; 23(4):e249-55. PubMed ID: 23816155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A qualitative study of safe abortion and post-abortion family planning service experiences of women attending private facilities in Kenya.
    Penfold S; Wendot S; Nafula I; Footman K
    Reprod Health; 2018 Apr; 15(1):70. PubMed ID: 29690897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How patients view mandatory waiting periods for abortion.
    Lupfer M; Silber BG
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 7250344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.