BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28392230)

  • 21. Unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an alternative for some cases of asymmetric mandibular prognathism.
    Fariña R; Mebus C; Mayer C; Torrealba R; Moreno E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 47(5):630-637. PubMed ID: 29223700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of soft tissue morphologic changes after using the alar base cinch suture in Le Fort I osteotomy in mandibular prognathism with and without asymmetry.
    Moroi A; Ishihara Y; Sotobori M; Nakazawa R; Higuchi M; Nakano Y; Marukawa K; Ueki K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):718-24. PubMed ID: 24424271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Condylar and disc positions after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with and without a Le Fort I osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Yoshida K; Hashiba Y; Shimizu C; Nakgawa K; Alam S; Yamamoto E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17239565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of changing position and angle of the proximal segment after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Hashiba Y; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Alam S; Okabe K; Yamamoto E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 38(10):1041-7. PubMed ID: 19477622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-Dimensional Changes in the Mandibular Proximal Segment After Using a Surgery-First Approach in Patients With Class III Malocclusion and Facial Asymmetry.
    Kim M; Jha N; Choi JH; Kim YJ; Lee U; Cevidanes L; Choi JY; Baek SH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 33(7):1956-1961. PubMed ID: 35175981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-dimensional condylar displacement and remodelling following correction of asymmetric mandibular prognathism with maxillary canting.
    Abotaleb BM; Bi R; Jiang N; Ye B; Bai Y; Al-Watary MQ; Zhu S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 51(6):813-822. PubMed ID: 34924271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Condylar surface CT value in sagittal plane before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Ikawa H; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Saito Y; Fukaya K; Hiraide R; Takayama A; Tsunoda T
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 21(2):159-169. PubMed ID: 28247093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Correlation between craniofacial and condylar path asymmetry.
    Hashimoto T; Kuroda S; E L; Tanimoto Y; Miyawaki S; Takano-Yamamoto T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2020-7. PubMed ID: 18848097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surgery-First and Orthodontic-First Approaches Produce Similar Patterns of Condylar Displacement and Remodeling in Patients With Skeletal Class III Malocclusion.
    He X; He J; Yuan H; Chen W; Jiang H; Cheng J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 77(7):1446-1456. PubMed ID: 30853422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Changes in the position of the condyle after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular retrusion and protrusion: a new condyle: fossa matching concept.
    Yin Q; Bi R; Abotaleb B; Jiang N; Li Y; Zhu S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 57(10):1086-1091. PubMed ID: 31623933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does adjunctive fixation in conjunction with miniplate affect condylar position and morphology after mandibular advancement through bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy? A retrospective 3-dimensional CT comparative study.
    Al-Watary MQ; Telha WA; Ge H; Wu Y; Sun X; Qing Z; Li J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 52(6):778-785. PubMed ID: 38627189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Three-dimensional changes in condylar position in skeletal class Ⅲ patients with mandibular deviation after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy].
    Huang JQ; Huang Z; Wu J; Wang YJ; Sang T; Liu F; Zheng Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):649-655. PubMed ID: 31606999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of short-term condylar positional changes in mandibular prognathism after surgery-first approach: Symmetric setback versus asymmetric setback.
    Park CH; Jeon JB; Oh S; Oh HK; Lee KM; Cho JH; Hwang HS; Oh MH
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Nov; 123(6):e940-e947. PubMed ID: 35817318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is distal segment ostectomy essential for stabilization of the condylar position in patients with facial asymmetry?
    Hong KE; Shin ES; Park J; Yun JE; Kim CH; Kim JH; Kim BJ
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Nov; 43(1):41. PubMed ID: 34807339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of lateral pterygoid muscle and temporomandibular joint disc after Le Fort I osteotomy with and without intentional pterygoid plate fracture and sagittal split ramus osteotomy in class II and class III patients.
    Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Takayama A; Baba N; Kimura Y; Koizumi M; Fujimoto K; Iguchi R; Ono S; Osada AH; Moroi A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 34598864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Effect of segmental Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the condyle position in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
    He W; Xie XY; Wang X; Wang XX; Fu KY; Li ZL
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Oct; 47(5):829-33. PubMed ID: 26474625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantitative assessment of condyle positional changes before and after orthognathic surgery based on fused 3D images from cone beam computed tomography.
    Ma RH; Li G; Yin S; Sun Y; Li ZL; Ma XC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Aug; 24(8):2663-2672. PubMed ID: 31728734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comprehensive Analysis of Mandibular Residual Asymmetry after Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Correction of Menton Point Deviation.
    Lin H; Zhu P; Lin Q; Huang X; Xu Y; Yang X
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161601. PubMed ID: 27571364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of treatment with unilateral mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy and maxillary osteotomy in patients with condylar osteochondroma and mandibular asymmetry: A retrospective case series.
    Xia L; Jiang W; Yao K; Wei S; Yu W; Lu X
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 51(2):123-129. PubMed ID: 36803856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.