137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28392313)
1. Uncomplicated and Cancer-Free Control Probability (UCFCP): A new integral approach to treatment plan optimization in photon radiation therapy.
Sánchez-Nieto B; Romero-Expósito M; Terrón JA; Sánchez-Doblado F
Phys Med; 2017 Oct; 42():277-284. PubMed ID: 28392313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiobiological impact of reduced margins and treatment technique for prostate cancer in terms of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
Jensen I; Carl J; Lund B; Larsen EH; Nielsen J
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 20488692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.
Luxton G; Hancock SL; Boyer AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 15093924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiobiologic comparison of helical tomotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy, and conformal radiotherapy in treating lung cancer accounting for secondary malignancy risks.
Komisopoulos G; Mavroidis P; Rodriguez S; Stathakis S; Papanikolaou N; Nikiforidis GC; Sakellaropoulos GC
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 25168596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intensity modulated radiation therapy dose painting for localized prostate cancer using ¹¹C-choline positron emission tomography scans.
Chang JH; Lim Joon D; Lee ST; Gong SJ; Anderson NJ; Scott AM; Davis ID; Clouston D; Bolton D; Hamilton CS; Khoo V
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):e691-6. PubMed ID: 22658218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy in high risk prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison.
Digesú C; Cilla S; De Gaetano A; Massaccesi M; Macchia G; Ippolito E; Deodato F; Panunzi S; Iapalucci C; Mattiucci GC; D'Angelo E; Padula GD; Valentini V; Cellini N; Piermattei A; Morganti AG
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 20541394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Constituent components of out-of-field scatter dose for 18-MV intensity modulated radiation therapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy: a comparison with 6-MV and implications for carcinogenesis.
Ruben JD; Smith R; Lancaster CM; Haynes M; Jones P; Panettieri V
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Nov; 90(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 25084609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of 6 and 15 MV on intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer treatment: plan evaluation, tumour control probability and normal tissue complication probability analysis, and the theoretical risk of secondary induced malignancies.
Hussein M; Aldridge S; Guerrero Urbano T; Nisbet A
Br J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 85(1012):423-32. PubMed ID: 22010028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiobiological impact of dose calculation algorithms on biologically optimized IMRT lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans.
Liang X; Penagaricano J; Zheng D; Morrill S; Zhang X; Corry P; Griffin RJ; Han EY; Hardee M; Ratanatharathom V
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jan; 11():10. PubMed ID: 26800883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Response-probability volume histograms and iso-probability of response charts in treatment plan evaluation.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Lopes Mdo C
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2382-97. PubMed ID: 21776773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of a spacer gel to optimize three-dimensional conformal and intensity modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Pinkawa M; Corral NE; Caffaro M; Piroth MD; Holy R; Djukic V; Otto G; Schoth F; Eble MJ
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):436-41. PubMed ID: 21963289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rectal complication probability from composite volumes derived from daily cone beam computed tomography in prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Prabhakar R; Oates R; Daryl J; Chang J; Geso M; Cramb J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2016; 12(1):374-8. PubMed ID: 27072266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose escalation in prostate cancer using intensity modulated neutron radiotherapy.
Snyder M; Joiner MC; Konski A; Bossenberger T; Burmeister J
Radiother Oncol; 2011 May; 99(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 21620496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potential improvements in the therapeutic ratio of prostate cancer irradiation: dose escalation of pathologically identified tumour nodules using intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Nutting CM; Corbishley CM; Sanchez-Nieto B; Cosgrove VP; Webb S; Dearnaley DP
Br J Radiol; 2002 Feb; 75(890):151-61. PubMed ID: 11893639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Helical tomotherapy vs. intensity-modulated proton therapy for whole pelvis irradiation in high-risk prostate cancer patients: dosimetric, normal tissue complication probability, and generalized equivalent uniform dose analysis.
Widesott L; Pierelli A; Fiorino C; Lomax AJ; Amichetti M; Cozzarini C; Soukup M; Schneider R; Hug E; Di Muzio N; Calandrino R; Schwarz M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Aug; 80(5):1589-600. PubMed ID: 21167651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Online adaptation and verification of VMAT.
Crijns W; Defraene G; Van Herck H; Depuydt T; Haustermans K; Maes F; Van den Heuvel F
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3877-91. PubMed ID: 26133589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric and radiobiologic comparison of 3D conformal versus intensity modulated planning techniques for prostate bed radiotherapy.
Koontz BF; Das S; Temple K; Bynum S; Catalano S; Koontz JI; Montana GS; Oleson JR
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 19647638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. IMRT: improvement in treatment planning efficiency using NTCP calculation independent of the dose-volume-histogram.
Grigorov GN; Chow JC; Grigorov L; Jiang R; Barnett RB
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1250-8. PubMed ID: 16752559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
