These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 283929)
1. Re-inforcement of amalgam. Part II: the relative stapling potential of certain embedded metal configurations. el-Bahloul AN Egypt Dent J; 1977 Oct; 23(4):95-109. PubMed ID: 283929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Re-inforcement of amalgam. 1: Effect of pin orientation, type, and number on the tensile strength of amalgam. el-Bahloul AN Egypt Dent J; 1977 Apr; 23(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 271565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Optimized pin geometry for improved retention of parapulpal pins in amalgam]. Neumeyer S; Gernet W; Bötsch H Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Aug; 46(8):550-2. PubMed ID: 1817928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of cross-sectional area on transverse strength of Amalgapin-retained restorations. Certosimo AJ; House RC; Anderson MH Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 1803331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of three types of pins on compressive strength of dental amalgam. Duperon DF; Kasloff Z J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1971 Nov; 37(11):422-8. PubMed ID: 5288885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Amalgam retention using pins, boxes, and Amalgambond. Fischer GM; Stewart GP; Panelli J Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 7803002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Conservative restoration in the posterior teeth using amalgam for a cusp overlay. Clinical cases. II]. Palattella G; Mangani F; Palattella P; Santori L Dent Cadmos; 1986 Jul; 54(12):79-82. PubMed ID: 3464479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Restorative dentistry: the use of metallic pins as means for retention. II. Restorations and "answers" to dental structure by insertion of pins]. Pacces JG; Simonetti EL Ars Curandi Odontol; 1979 Jan; 5(10):4-14. PubMed ID: 285659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Performance of a tooth with amalgam for support of cast pins]. Hirata JM Ars Curandi Odontol; 1977 Dec; 4(9):4-17. PubMed ID: 391200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pins and their relation to cavity resistance form for amalgam. Buikema DJ; Mayhew RB; Voss JE; Bales DJ Quintessence Int; 1985 Mar; 16(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 3857664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Slot retention: an alternative to pins in the large amalgam restoration. Newsome PR Dent Update; 1988 Jun; 15(5):202, 204-7. PubMed ID: 3267596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pins and intracoronal retentive features for multisurface amalgam restorations. Munk MB; Brokaw WC Gen Dent; 1989; 37(4):320-3. PubMed ID: 2638287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Study of marginal microinfiltration in Class II amalgam restorations with pins, employing 131INa and rhodamine-B]. Achutti MA; Galan Júnior J; Monelli J Ars Curandi Odontol; 1977 Jul; 4(4):36-42. PubMed ID: 293155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations. Eberting JJ Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Marginal microinfiltration in Class II amalgam and composite resin restorations, with or without pins, submitted to thermal cycles]. Coradazzi JL; Mondelli J; Valera RC Ars Curandi Odontol; 1979 Feb; 5(11):9-14. PubMed ID: 397813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]