284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28392944)
1. Monitoring Fetal Heart Rate during Labor: A Comparison of Three Methods.
Euliano TY; Darmanjian S; Nguyen MT; Busowski JD; Euliano N; Gregg AR
J Pregnancy; 2017; 2017():8529816. PubMed ID: 28392944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel modality for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
Ashwal E; Shinar S; Aviram A; Orbach S; Yogev Y; Hiersch L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Mar; 32(6):889-895. PubMed ID: 29096560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of maternal body mass index on accuracy and reliability of external fetal monitoring techniques.
Cohen WR; Hayes-Gill B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 24684703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and reliability of fetal heart rate monitoring using maternal abdominal surface electrodes.
Cohen WR; Ommani S; Hassan S; Mirza FG; Solomon M; Brown R; Schifrin BS; Himsworth JM; Hayes-Gill BR
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Nov; 91(11):1306-13. PubMed ID: 22924738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative accuracy of computerized intrapartum fetal heart rate pattern recognition by ultrasound and abdominal electrocardiogram detection.
Hayes-Gill BR; Martin TRP; Liu C; Cohen WR
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Mar; 99(3):413-422. PubMed ID: 31792930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intrapartum non-invasive electrophysiological monitoring: A prospective observational study.
Lempersz C; Noben L; van Osta G; Wassen MLH; Meershoek BPJ; Bakker P; Jacquemyn Y; Cuerva MJ; Vullings R; Westerhuis MEMH; Oei GS
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Oct; 99(10):1387-1395. PubMed ID: 32306380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of fetal heart rate monitoring with transabdominal fetal ECG during maternal movement in labor: A prospective study.
Reis-de-Carvalho C; Nogueira P; Ayres-de-Campos D
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Nov; 101(11):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 35959521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using fetal scalp stimulation with Doppler ultrasonography to enhance intermittent auscultation in low-resource settings: a diagnostic trial from Tanzania.
Goodman DM; Mlay P; Thielman N; Small MJ; Schmitt JW
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Feb; 19(1):71. PubMed ID: 30760224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beat-to-beat detection of fetal heart rate: Doppler ultrasound cardiotocography compared to direct ECG cardiotocography in time and frequency domain.
Peters CH; ten Broeke ED; Andriessen P; Vermeulen B; Berendsen RC; Wijn PF; Oei SG
Physiol Meas; 2004 Apr; 25(2):585-93. PubMed ID: 15132321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Misidentification of maternal heart rate as fetal on cardiotocography during the second stage of labor: the role of the fetal electrocardiograph.
Nurani R; Chandraharan E; Lowe V; Ugwumadu A; Arulkumaran S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1428-32. PubMed ID: 22881463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation and patient experience of wireless noninvasive fetal heart rate monitoring devices.
Eenkhoorn C; Goos TG; Dankelman J; Franx A; Eggink AJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 May; 103(5):980-991. PubMed ID: 38229258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrapartum cardiotocography with simultaneous maternal heart rate registration improves neonatal outcome.
Tarvonen M; Markkanen J; Tuppurainen V; Jernman R; Stefanovic V; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 230(4):379.e1-379.e12. PubMed ID: 38272284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrapartum heart rate ambiguity: a comparison of cardiotocogram and abdominal fetal electrocardiogram with maternal electrocardiogram.
Reinhard J; Hayes-Gill BR; Schiermeier S; Hatzmann H; Heinrich TM; Louwen F
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23328351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation of the combined use of non-invasive fetal electrocardiography and electrohysterography during labor: A prospective clinical study.
Frenken MWE; Van Der Woude DAA; Vullings R; Oei SG; Van Laar JOEH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jul; 102(7):865-872. PubMed ID: 37170633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-invasive intrapartum fetal ECG: preliminary report.
Taylor MJ; Thomas MJ; Smith MJ; Oseku-Afful S; Fisk NM; Green AR; Paterson-Brown S; Gardiner HM
BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1016-21. PubMed ID: 16045511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new method of fetal heart rate monitoring.
Leventhal JM; Brown WU; Weiss JB; Alper MH
Obstet Gynecol; 1975 May; 45(5):494-500. PubMed ID: 1124164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal heart rate monitoring of short term variation (STV): a methodological observational study.
Wretler S; Holzmann M; Graner S; Lindqvist P; Falck S; Nordström L
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Mar; 16():55. PubMed ID: 26984160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of a Maternal Abdominal Surface Electrode System for Fetal Heart Rate and Uterine Contraction Monitoring from 34 to 37 Weeks.
Gonzalez M; Hill M; Cohen WR
Am J Perinatol; 2024 Feb; 41(3):263-269. PubMed ID: 34666382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients.
Kwee A; van der Hoorn-van den Beld CW; Veerman J; Dekkers AH; Visser GH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 15280112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of intrapartum cardiotocography in twin deliveries.
Bakker PC; Colenbrander GJ; Verstraeten AA; Van Geijn HP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):2114-9. PubMed ID: 15592300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
