BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28393330)

  • 1. External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Anchu AC; Mohsina S; Sureshkumar S; Mahalakshmy T; Kate V
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 36(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 28393330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Thanapirom K; Ridtitid W; Rerknimitr R; Thungsuk R; Noophun P; Wongjitrat C; Luangjaru S; Vedkijkul P; Lertkupinit C; Poonsab S; Ratanachu-ek T; Hansomburana P; Pornthisarn B; Thongbai T; Mahachai V; Treeprasertsuk S
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Apr; 31(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 26514879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems.
    Cheng DW; Lu YW; Teller T; Sekhon HK; Wu BU
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Oct; 36(8):782-9. PubMed ID: 22928529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ko IG; Kim SE; Chang BS; Kwak MS; Yoon JY; Cha JM; Shin HP; Lee JI; Kim SH; Han JH; Jeon JW
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
    Rout G; Sharma S; Gunjan D; Kedia S; Nayak B; Shalimar
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Wang CH; Chen YW; Young YR; Yang CJ; Chen IC
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 May; 31(5):775-8. PubMed ID: 23465874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CLINICAL UTILITY OF RISK SCORES IN VARICEAL BLEEDING.
    Chandnani S; Rathi P; Udgirkar SS; Sonthalia N; Contractor Q; Jain S
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2019; 56(3):286-293. PubMed ID: 31633727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the quick SOFA score with Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scores in predicting severity in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Taslidere B; Sonmez E; Özcan AB; Mehmetaj L; Keskin EB; Gulen B
    Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 45():29-36. PubMed ID: 33647759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?
    Le Jeune IR; Gordon AL; Farrugia D; Manwani R; Guha IN; James MW
    Acute Med; 2011; 10(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 22111089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development, Validation, and Comparative Assessment of an International Scoring System to Determine Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Oakland K; Kahan BC; Guizzetti L; Martel M; Bryant RV; Brahmania M; Singh S; Nguyen NQ; Sey MSL; Barkun A; Jairath V
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 17(6):1121-1129.e2. PubMed ID: 30268566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L; Xu F; Yuan J
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a Machine Learning Model That Outperforms Clinical Risk Scoring Systems for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Shung DL; Au B; Taylor RA; Tay JK; Laursen SB; Stanley AJ; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Schultz M; Laine L
    Gastroenterology; 2020 Jan; 158(1):160-167. PubMed ID: 31562847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage?
    Reed EA; Dalton H; Blatchford O; Ashley D; Mowat C; Gaya DR; Cahill A; Warshow U; Hare N; Groome M; Forrest EH; Morris J; Stanley AJ
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 26(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 24535596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.