195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28393585)
1. Comparison study of consecutive 100 cases of single port vs. multiport laparoscopic myomectomy; technical point of view.
Lee SW; Park EK; Lee SJ; Lee KH
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jul; 37(5):616-621. PubMed ID: 28393585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical outcomes of a new approach to laparoscopic myomectomy: single-port and modified suture technique.
Choi CH; Kim TH; Kim SH; Choi JK; Park JY; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):580-5. PubMed ID: 24384072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-port laparoscopically assisted-transumbilical ultraminilaparotomic myomectomy (SPLA-TUM) versus single port laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Yuk JS; Ji HY; Kim KH; Lee JH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():83-7. PubMed ID: 25796058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A case-control study to compare the outcome of women treated by two minimally invasive procedures-ultraminilaparotomy myomectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy.
Wen KC; Sung PL; Chang WH; Horng HC; Chen YJ; Lee WL; Wang PH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 57(2):264-269. PubMed ID: 29673671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic myomectomy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
Song T; Kim TJ; Lee SH; Kim TH; Kim WY
Fertil Steril; 2015 Nov; 104(5):1325-31. PubMed ID: 26263079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perioperative Outcomes of Myomectomy for Extreme Myoma Burden: Comparison of Surgical Approaches.
Jansen LJ; Clark NV; Dmello M; Gu X; Einarsson JI; Cohen SL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1095-1103. PubMed ID: 30391510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-Site Robotic Myomectomy without Accessory Instrument Compared with Two-Port Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Kim JH; Lee EJ
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2022; 87(1):70-78. PubMed ID: 35231906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advantages of Single-Port Laparoscopic Myomectomy Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Lee D; Kim SK; Kim K; Lee JR; Suh CS; Kim SH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 28826957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single port laparoscopic myomectomy with intracorporeal suture-tying and transumbilical morcellation.
Lee JR; Lee JH; Kim JY; Chang HJ; Suh CS; Kim SH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Oct; 181():200-4. PubMed ID: 25150961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Single-center Retrospective Review of 514 Patients.
Bean EM; Cutner A; Holland T; Vashisht A; Jurkovic D; Saridogan E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):485-493. PubMed ID: 28104498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of uterine scarring between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy and conventional laparoscopic myomectomy.
Sheu BC; Huang KJ; Huang SC; Chang WC
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Oct; 40(7):974-980. PubMed ID: 31790613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Reduced-Port Robotic Surgery (RPRS) with conventional 2 port laparoscopy for myomectomy.
Lee NH; Lee SH; Kim WY
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():181-185. PubMed ID: 32120179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy using conventional laparoscopic instruments and glove port technique: Four years experience in 109 cases.
Chen SY; Sheu BC; Huang SC; Chang WC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 56(4):467-471. PubMed ID: 28805602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison between reduced-port robotic surgery and multiport robot-assisted laparoscopy for myomectomy.
Nam SH; Paek J; Choi C; Nam SH; Kim WY
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jun; 213():53-57. PubMed ID: 28426944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Large Myomas With and Without Leuprolide Acetate.
Chang WC; Chu LH; Huang PS; Huang SC; Sheu BC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):992-6. PubMed ID: 25958038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison of Single-, Two- and Three-Port Laparoscopic Myomectomy.
Kim SM; Baek JM; Park EK; Jeung IC; Choi JH; Kim CJ; Lee YS
JSLS; 2015; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 26648680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of Risk Factors for Intraoperative Conversion of Laparoscopic Myomectomy.
Sandberg EM; Cohen SL; Jansen FW; Einarsson JI
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 26546180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of 2-port laparoscopic surgery for gynecologic disease: invention of new suture technique.
Suzuki S; Furukawa S; Ohara M; Kanno K; Yasuda S; Ohzeki T; Watanabe T; Takahashi H; Suzuki H; Fujimori K
Fukushima J Med Sci; 2014; 60(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 25410442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicentre study to evaluate the clinical effects of laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion in combination with myomectomy to treat symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.
Yang W; Cheng Z; Yu J; Yang H; Liu Z; Ren Q; Xu L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Sep; 204():9-15. PubMed ID: 27471836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Laparoscopic vs abdominal myomectomy].
Bechev B; Magunska N; Ivanov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2014; 53(3):20-4. PubMed ID: 25509641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
