127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28394159)
21. Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.
Carpenter SK; DeLosh EL
Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 16752591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How does delayed testing reduce effects of implicit memory: context infusion or cuing with context?
Nelson DL; Goodmon LB; Ceo D
Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1014-23. PubMed ID: 17910185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Errors may not cue recall of corrective feedback: Evidence against the mediation hypothesis of the testing effect.
Leggett JMI; Burt JS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 31944809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. How implicitly activated and explicitly acquired knowledge contribute to the effectiveness of retrieval cues.
Nelson DL; Fisher SL; Akirmak U
Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1892-904. PubMed ID: 18265606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Encoding specificity revisited: the role of semantics.
Hannon B; Craik FI
Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Sep; 55(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 11605558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Semantic knowledge influences whether novel episodic associations are represented symmetrically or asymmetrically.
Popov V; Zhang Q; Koch GE; Calloway RC; Coutanche MN
Mem Cognit; 2019 Nov; 47(8):1567-1581. PubMed ID: 31215011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pure mediated priming: a retrospective semantic matching model.
Jones LL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 20053050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
Pyc MA; Rawson KA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reinstating higher order properties of a study list by retrieving a list item.
Humphreys MS; Murray KL; Koh JY
Mem Cognit; 2014 May; 42(4):570-82. PubMed ID: 24307169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effectiveness of test-enhanced learning depends on trait test anxiety and working-memory capacity.
Tse CS; Pu X
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Sep; 18(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 22774786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Age of acquisition's effect on memory for semantically associated word pairs.
Gullick MM; Juhasz BJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1177-85. PubMed ID: 18609409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Generation and associative encoding in young and old adults: the effect of the strength of association between cues and targets on a cued recall task.
Taconnat L; Froger C; Sacher M; Isingrini M
Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18271350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does test-enhanced learning transfer for triple associates?
Pan SC; Wong CM; Potter ZE; Mejia J; Rickard TC
Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 26324093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. One step is not enough: making better use of association norms to predict cued recall.
Nelson DL; Bennett DJ; Leibert TW
Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):785-96. PubMed ID: 9421564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Making remembering more memorable.
Leppanen ML; Lyle KB
Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):960-973. PubMed ID: 29291672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
Rickard TC; Bajic D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Aging and the stability of activation and sampling in cued recall.
McEvoy CL; Holley PE
Psychol Aging; 1990 Dec; 5(4):589-96. PubMed ID: 2278685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Learning from your mistakes: does it matter if you're out in left foot, I mean field?
Cyr AA; Anderson ND
Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 29659332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Recognition during recall failure: Semantic feature matching as a mechanism for recognition of semantic cues when recall fails.
Cleary AM; Ryals AJ; Wagner SR
Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 26282623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 26857480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
