These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28394159)

  • 41. Sleep can reduce the testing effect: it enhances recall of restudied items but can leave recall of retrieved items unaffected.
    Bäuml KH; Holterman C; Abel M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1568-81. PubMed ID: 24933697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The role of episodic context in retrieval practice effects.
    Whiffen JW; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1036-1046. PubMed ID: 28080119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of similarity on environmental context cueing.
    Smith SM; Handy JD; Angello G; Manzano I
    Memory; 2014; 22(5):493-508. PubMed ID: 23721293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Does mediator use contribute to the spacing effect for cued recall? Critical tests of the mediator hypothesis.
    Morehead K; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA; Bishop M; Pyc MA
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):535-546. PubMed ID: 28978279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments.
    Schwartz BL; Metcalfe J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Sep; 18(5):1074-83. PubMed ID: 1402711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Experiencing a word can prime its accessibility and its associative connections to related words.
    Nelson DL; Goodmon LB
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Apr; 30(3):380-98. PubMed ID: 12061759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fan effects in event-based prospective memory.
    Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL; Martin BA
    Memory; 2006 Oct; 14(7):890-900. PubMed ID: 16938699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Diagnosing criterion-level effects on memory: what aspects of memory are enhanced by repeated retrieval?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1127-31. PubMed ID: 21813798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): a formalization of the comparator hypothesis.
    Stout SC; Miller RR
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):759-83. PubMed ID: 17638505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Aging and semantic cueing during learning and retention of verbal episodic information.
    Woo E; Schmitter-Edgecombe M
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2009; 16(1):103-19. PubMed ID: 18923945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates.
    Meltzer JA; Constable RT
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(2):384-97. PubMed ID: 15627581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Release from generation failure: the role of study list structure.
    Higham PA; Tam H
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):148-57. PubMed ID: 16686114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities.
    Nelson DL; Dyrdal GM; Goodmon LB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):711-9. PubMed ID: 16447386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Memory as discrimination: a challenge to the encoding-retrieval match principle.
    Poirier M; Nairne JS; Morin C; Zimmermann FG; Koutmeridou K; Fowler J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 21823814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Filling in the gaps: using testing and restudy to promote associative learning.
    Bulevich JB; Thomas AK; Parsow C
    Memory; 2016 Oct; 24(9):1267-77. PubMed ID: 26492973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Encoding and cuing sounds and senses.
    Nelson DL; Friedrich MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Nov; 6(6):717-31. PubMed ID: 7441188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: clinical application of the testing effect.
    Sumowski JF; Chiaravalloti N; Deluca J
    Neuropsychology; 2010 Mar; 24(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 20230121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.