These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28394159)

  • 61. Semantic organization and verbal episodic memory in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease.
    Herlitz A; Viitanen M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1991 Jul; 13(4):559-74. PubMed ID: 1918286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The costs and benefits of testing and guessing on recognition memory.
    Huff MJ; Balota DA; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1559-1572. PubMed ID: 26950490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Updating and pre-existing semantic associations: testing can enhance or impair new learning.
    Smith WG; Delaney PF
    Memory; 2023 Apr; 31(4):530-544. PubMed ID: 36745711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Older adults show deficits in retrieving and decoding associative mediators generated at study.
    Hertzog C; Fulton EK; Mandviwala L; Dunlosky J
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Jun; 49(6):1127-31. PubMed ID: 22799582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. In search of cross-talk facilitation in a dual-cued recall task.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):750-67. PubMed ID: 16060778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it.
    Huelser BJ; Metcalfe J
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):514-27. PubMed ID: 22161209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Priming or executive control? Associative priming of cue encoding increases "switch costs" in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Logan GD; Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1250-9. PubMed ID: 17225506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Analysis of the encoding factors that produce the negative repetition effect.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 24548323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Conflict and metacognitive control: the mismatch-monitoring hypothesis of how others' knowledge states affect recall.
    Fraundorf SH; Benjamin AS
    Memory; 2016 Sep; 24(8):1108-22. PubMed ID: 26247369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Theoretical implications of extralist probes for directed forgetting.
    Sahakyan L; Goodmon LB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):920-37. PubMed ID: 20565210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Visual and semantic support for paired-associates recall in young and older adults.
    Sharps MJ; Antonelli JR
    J Genet Psychol; 1997 Sep; 158(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 9255961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Cue set size effects: sampling activated associates or cross-target interference?
    Nelson DL; Schreiber TA; Xu J
    Mem Cognit; 1999 May; 27(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 10355236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Are implicitly activated associates selectively activated?
    Nelson DL; McKinney VM; McEvoy CL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 12747498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Item repetition and retrieval processes in cued recall: Analysis of recall-latency distributions.
    Jang Y; Lee H
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):792-815. PubMed ID: 30737728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
    Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Is retrieval mediated after repeated testing?
    Kole JA; Healy AF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):462-72. PubMed ID: 22686841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Nonstrategic facilitation of children's recall: evidence of triage with semantically related information.
    Harnishfeger KK; Brainerd CJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1994 Apr; 57(2):259-80. PubMed ID: 8169581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall.
    Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 16822150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Production does not improve memory for face-name associations.
    Hourihan KL; Smith AR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 27244356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.