402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28394818)
21. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Visualization of small brain nuclei with a high-spatial resolution, clinically available whole-body PET scanner.
Shinohara Y; Ibaraki M; Matsubara K; Sato K; Yamamoto H; Kinoshita T
Ann Nucl Med; 2024 Feb; 38(2):154-161. PubMed ID: 37989801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Using EQ·PET to reduce reconstruction-dependent variations in [
Vanhoutte M; Semah F; Lopes R; Jaillard A; Petyt G; Aziz AL; Lahousse H; Declerck J; Pasquier F; Spottiswoode B; Fahmi R
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):175002. PubMed ID: 31344691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.
Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The association of tumor-to-background ratios and SUVmax deviations related to point spread function and time-of-flight F18-FDG-PET/CT reconstruction in colorectal liver metastases.
Rogasch JM; Steffen IG; Hofheinz F; Großer OS; Furth C; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Apostolova I; Amthauer H
EJNMMI Res; 2015; 5():31. PubMed ID: 25992306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A NIM PET/CT phantom for evaluating the PET image quality of micro-lesions and the performance parameters of CT.
Lu S; Zhang P; Li C; Sun J; Liu W; Zhang P
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Nov; 21(1):165. PubMed ID: 34749660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Edge Artifacts in Point Spread Function-based PET Reconstruction in Relation to Object Size and Reconstruction Parameters.
Tsutsui Y; Awamoto S; Himuro K; Umezu Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2017; 5(2):134-143. PubMed ID: 28660224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction.
Rogasch JM; Hofheinz F; Lougovski A; Furth C; Ruf J; Großer OS; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Amthauer H; Steffen IG
EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 26501454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relationship between the image quality and noise-equivalent count in time-of-flight positron emission tomography.
Maebatake A; Akamatsu G; Miwa K; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Baba S; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 30(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 26486151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging.
Aklan B; Oehmigen M; Beiderwellen K; Ruhlmann M; Paulus DH; Jakoby BW; Ritt P; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26471697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimization of Image Reconstruction for
Rowley LM; Bradley KM; Boardman P; Hallam A; McGowan DR
J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 27688476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of varying number of OSEM subsets on PET lesion detectability.
Morey AM; Kadrmas DJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 24221921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Relaxed ordered subset preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for PET reconstruction with automated penalty weight selection.
Ross Schmidtlein C; Lin Y; Li S; Krol A; Beattie BJ; Humm JL; Xu Y
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4083-4097. PubMed ID: 28437565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Changes of [
Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Accuracy of Resolution Recovery in PSF-based Fully-3D PET Image Reconstruction: Simulation and Phantom Study in Multicenter Trial].
Kangai Y; Odajima S; Matsutomo N; Kamiya T; Mizuta T; Onishi H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 72(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 27000669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical evaluation of (18)F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT using point spread function reconstruction for nodal staging of colorectal cancer.
Kawashima K; Kato K; Tomabechi M; Matsuo M; Otsuka K; Ishida K; Nakamura R; Ehara S
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150938. PubMed ID: 27146065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Phantom and clinical assessment of small pulmonary nodules using Q.Clear reconstruction on a silicon-photomultiplier-based time-of-flight PET/CT system.
Wu Z; Guo B; Huang B; Hao X; Wu P; Zhao B; Qin Z; Xie J; Li S
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10328. PubMed ID: 33990659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Tumor volume-adapted SUV
Mosleh-Shirazi MA; Nasiri-Feshani Z; Ghafarian P; Alavi M; Haddadi G; Ketabi A
Jpn J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):811-823. PubMed ID: 33880686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The impact of iterative reconstruction protocol, signal-to-background ratio and background activity on measurement of PET spatial resolution.
Rezaei S; Ghafarian P; Bakhshayesh-Karam M; Uribe CF; Rahmim A; Sarkar S; Ay MR
Jpn J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 31894449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
