These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28394938)

  • 1. Words from spontaneous conversational speech can be recognized with human-like accuracy by an error-driven learning algorithm that discriminates between meanings straight from smart acoustic features, bypassing the phoneme as recognition unit.
    Arnold D; Tomaschek F; Sering K; Lopez F; Baayen RH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0174623. PubMed ID: 28394938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In Spoken Word Recognition, the Future Predicts the Past.
    Gwilliams L; Linzen T; Poeppel D; Marantz A
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(35):7585-7599. PubMed ID: 30012695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of segmental and durational cues in the processing of reduced words.
    van de Ven M; Ernestus M
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):358-383. PubMed ID: 28870139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling the use of durational information in human spoken-word recognition.
    Scharenborg O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3758-70. PubMed ID: 20550274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phoneme discrimination using connectionist networks.
    Watrous RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1753-72. PubMed ID: 2341680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sublexical properties of spoken words modulate activity in Broca's area but not superior temporal cortex: implications for models of speech recognition.
    Vaden KI; Piquado T; Hickok G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):2665-74. PubMed ID: 21261450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.
    Wang X; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2100-11. PubMed ID: 20968381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners.
    Imai S; Walley AC; Flege JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):896-907. PubMed ID: 15759709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of speech-intrinsic variations on human and automatic recognition of spoken phonemes.
    Meyer BT; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):388-403. PubMed ID: 21303019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of contextual cues on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Kong YY; Donaldson G; Somarowthu A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2846-57. PubMed ID: 25994712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Errors on a Speech-in-Babble Sentence Recognition Test Reveal Individual Differences in Acoustic Phonetic Perception and Babble Misallocations.
    Bernstein LE; Eberhardt SP; Auer ET
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):673-690. PubMed ID: 33928926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of speech modification on non-native listeners for matrix-style sentences.
    Cooke M; García Lecumberri ML; Tang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL151-7. PubMed ID: 25698043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A tradeoff between acoustic and linguistic feature encoding in spoken language comprehension.
    Tezcan F; Weissbart H; Martin AE
    Elife; 2023 Jul; 12():. PubMed ID: 37417736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual learning of noise vocoded words: effects of feedback and lexicality.
    Hervais-Adelman A; Davis MH; Johnsrude IS; Carlyon RP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):460-74. PubMed ID: 18377182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual learning for speech in noise after application of binary time-frequency masks.
    Ahmadi M; Gross VL; Sinex DG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1687-92. PubMed ID: 23464038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sine-wave speech recognition in a tonal language.
    Feng YM; Xu L; Zhou N; Yang G; Yin SK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):EL133-8. PubMed ID: 22352612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.