These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28396648)

  • 1. A Double Dissociation between Conscious and Non-conscious Priming of Responses and Affect: Evidence for a Contribution of Misattributions to the Priming of Affect.
    Goller F; Khalid S; Ansorge U
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():453. PubMed ID: 28396648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancement and suppression in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm.
    Abel S; Dressel K; Weiller C; Huber W
    Brain Behav; 2012 Mar; 2(2):109-27. PubMed ID: 22574280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conflict-Elicited Negative Evaluations of Neutral Stimuli: Testing Overt Responses and Stimulus-Frequency Differences as Critical Side Conditions.
    Goller F; Kroiss A; Ansorge U
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2204. PubMed ID: 31681065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal dissociation between distractors and targets: the impact of residual distractor processing on target responses.
    Kritikos A; McNeill J; Pavlis A
    J Mot Behav; 2008 Jan; 40(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 18316295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural correlates of conflict control on facial expressions with a flanker paradigm.
    Liu T; Xiao T; Shi JN
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e69683. PubMed ID: 23894521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings.
    Giesen C; Frings C; Rothermund K
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 22081277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjustments of selective attention to response conflict - controlling for perceptual conflict, target-distractor identity, and congruency level sequence pertaining to the congruency sequence effect.
    Tomat M; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2531-2550. PubMed ID: 33948882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Affective priming and cognitive load: Event-related potentials suggest an interplay of implicit affect misattribution and strategic inhibition.
    Gibbons H; Seib-Pfeifer LE; Koppehele-Gossel J; Schnuerch R
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 28940207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing Distracting Non-face Emotional Images: No Evidence of an Age-Related Positivity Effect.
    Madill M; Murray JE
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():591. PubMed ID: 28450848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of visual cross-modal conflict with semantic and nonsemantic distractors on working memory task: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.
    Sawamura D; Tanabe Y; Sakuraba S; Cui J; Miura H; Saito R; Sugi M; Watanabe A; Tokikuni Y; Sugawara K; Miyazaki M; Miyamoto R; Sakai S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Sep; 101(36):e30330. PubMed ID: 36086757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural evidence that inhibition is linked to the affective devaluation of distractors that match the contents of working memory.
    De Vito D; Al-Aidroos N; Fenske MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():259-269. PubMed ID: 28341131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative relation between conflict and response inhibition in the Flanker task.
    Takezawa T; Miyatani M
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Oct; 97(2):515-26. PubMed ID: 16342579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Watch the target! Effects in the affective misattribution procedure become weaker (but not eliminated) when participants are motivated to provide accurate responses to the target.
    Eder AB; Deutsch R
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1442. PubMed ID: 26441807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reward Modulates Affective Priming Effect in Cognitive Conflict Processing: Electrophysiological Evidence.
    Pan F; Ou Y; Zhang X
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():59. PubMed ID: 32161528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibition of irrelevant response codes is affected by matching target-distractor modalities.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):189-208. PubMed ID: 30589356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidences for better recall of congruent items in episodic memory.
    Laurent X; Estévez AF; Marí-Beffa P
    Cogn Process; 2020 Aug; 21(3):469-477. PubMed ID: 32086659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intertrial priming due to distractor repetition is eliminated in homogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1935-47. PubMed ID: 27165171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychophysiological Evidence of Response Conflict and Strategic Control of Responses in Affective Priming.
    Bartholow BD; Schepers Riordan MA; Saults JS; Lust SA
    J Exp Soc Psychol; 2009 Jul; 45(4):655-666. PubMed ID: 33981119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Inhibition and resource capacity during normal aging: a confrontation of the dorsal-ventral and frontal models in a modified version of negative priming].
    Martin S; Brouillet D; Guerdoux E; Tarrago R
    Encephale; 2006; 32(2 Pt 1):253-62. PubMed ID: 16910627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Negative priming with masked distractor-only prime trials: awareness moderates negative priming.
    Frings C; Wentura D
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 15850160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.