206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28396928)
1. Quality of life and cost-utility of surgical treatment for patients with spinal metastases: prospective cohort study.
Miyazaki S; Kakutani K; Sakai Y; Ejima Y; Maeno K; Takada T; Yurube T; Terashima Y; Ito M; Kakiuchi Y; Takeoka Y; Hara H; Kawamoto T; Sakashita A; Okada T; Kiyota N; Kizawa Y; Sasaki R; Akisue T; Minami H; Kuroda R; Nishida K
Int Orthop; 2017 Jun; 41(6):1265-1271. PubMed ID: 28396928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgery and Radiotherapy for Symptomatic Spinal Metastases Is More Cost Effective Than Radiotherapy Alone: A Cost Utility Analysis in a U.K. Spinal Center.
Turner I; Kennedy J; Morris S; Crockard A; Choi D
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jan; 109():e389-e397. PubMed ID: 28987846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a patient-centered quality of life and health economic evaluation.
Witiw CD; Tetreault LA; Smieliauskas F; Kopjar B; Massicotte EM; Fehlings MG
Spine J; 2017 Jan; 17(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 27793760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.
Rampersaud YR; Tso P; Walker KR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Mahomed NN; Coyte PC
Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-Utility Analysis of Surgery and Radiotherapy for Symptomatic Spinal Metastases in a Belgian Specialist Center.
Depreitere B; Turner I; Vandoren C; Choi D
World Neurosurg; 2019 May; 125():e537-e543. PubMed ID: 30716490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of obesity on cost per quality-adjusted life years gained following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in elective degenerative pathology.
Chotai S; Sielatycki JA; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Kay HL; Stonko DP; Wick JB; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1342-1350. PubMed ID: 27394664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between Open Transforaminal and Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions Using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio at 2-Year Follow-up.
Gandhoke GS; Shin HM; Chang YF; Tempel Z; Gerszten PC; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
Neurosurgery; 2016 Apr; 78(4):585-95. PubMed ID: 26726969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of surgical intervention on quality of life in patients with spinal metastases.
Falicov A; Fisher CG; Sparkes J; Boyd MC; Wing PC; Dvorak MF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2849-56. PubMed ID: 17108840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective cohort study of surgical outcome for spinal metastases in patients aged 70 years or older.
Kanda Y; Kakutani K; Sakai Y; Yurube T; Miyazaki S; Takada T; Hoshino Y; Kuroda R
Bone Joint J; 2020 Dec; 102-B(12):1709-1716. PubMed ID: 33249898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the Japanese universal health insurance system.
Fujimori T; Miwa T; Iwasaki M; Oda T
J Orthop Sci; 2018 Mar; 23(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 29276041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-utility analysis of routine neurosurgical spinal surgery.
Räsänen P; Ohman J; Sintonen H; Ryynänen OP; Koivisto AM; Blom M; Roine RP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Sep; 5(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 16961080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Health impact and economic analysis of NGO-supported neurosurgery in Bolivia.
Ament JD; Greene KR; Flores I; Capobianco F; Salas G; Uriona MI; Weaver JP; Moser R
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Apr; 20(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 24527825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cost-utility analysis of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus instrumented fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases.
Liu K; Sun W; Lu Q; Chen J; Tang J
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Nov; 22(6):982-987. PubMed ID: 28807742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment strategies of lumbar spinal stenosis in the Swiss setting: analysis of the prospective multicenter Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS).
Aichmair A; Burgstaller JM; Schwenkglenks M; Steurer J; Porchet F; Brunner F; Farshad M;
Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28040872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of laminectomy and extension of instrumented fusion for adjacent-segment disease: defining the value of surgical intervention.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Devin CJ; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 22054637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the implantable miniature telescope.
Brown GC; Brown MM; Lieske HB; Lieske PA; Brown KS; Lane SS
Ophthalmology; 2011 Sep; 118(9):1834-43. PubMed ID: 21723614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of revision neural decompression and instrumented fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the value of surgical intervention.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 22054639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic value of treating lumbar disc herniation in Brazil.
Falavigna A; Scheverin N; Righesso O; Teles AR; Gullo MC; Cheng JS; Riew KD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Apr; 24(4):608-14. PubMed ID: 26654336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgery for metastatic spine tumors in the elderly. Advanced age is not a contraindication to surgery!
Amelot A; Balabaud L; Choi D; Fox Z; Crockard HA; Albert T; Arts CM; Buchowski JM; Bunger C; Chung CK; Coppes MH; Depreitere B; Fehlings MG; Harrop J; Kawahara N; Kim ES; Lee CS; Leung Y; Liu ZJ; Martin-Benlloch JA; Massicotte EM; Meyer B; Oner FC; Peul W; Quraishi N; Tokuhashi Y; Tomita K; Ulbricht C; Verlaan JJ; Wang M; Mazel C
Spine J; 2017 Jun; 17(6):759-767. PubMed ID: 26239762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost-utility analysis.
van den Akker-van Marle ME; Moojen WA; Arts MP; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC;
Spine J; 2016 Jun; 16(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25452018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
