BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28396982)

  • 1. Frequency of sternal variations in living individuals.
    Turkay R; Inci E; Ors S; Nalbant MO; Gurses IA
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2017 Nov; 39(11):1273-1278. PubMed ID: 28396982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency of sternal variations and anomalies evaluated by MDCT.
    Yekeler E; Tunaci M; Tunaci A; Dursun M; Acunas G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Apr; 186(4):956-60. PubMed ID: 16554563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency of sternal variations and anomalies in living individuals evaluated by MDCT.
    Vatzia K; Fanariotis M; Makridis KG; Vlychou M; Fezoulidis IV; Vassiou K
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109828. PubMed ID: 34280594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anatomical variations of the sternum: sternal foramen and variant xiphoid morphology in dried adult human sternum in Ethiopia.
    Lema AS
    F1000Res; 2023; 12():934. PubMed ID: 38845617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sternal Development and Variations and Anomalies in Patients With Microtia: Evaluation Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography.
    Yang M; Jiang H; Yu X; Chen W; Li Q; Zhang Y; Pan B
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(5):784-791. PubMed ID: 28296686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Causes of photopenic defects in the lower sternum on bone scintigraphy and correlation with multidetector CT.
    Ishii S; Shishido F; Miyajima M; Sakuma K; Shigihara T; Kikuchi K; Nakajima M
    Clin Nucl Med; 2011 May; 36(5):355-8. PubMed ID: 21467851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Topographic evaluation of sternal foramen patients with thoracic computed tomography.
    Kuzucuoglu M; Albayrak I
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2020 Apr; 42(4):405-409. PubMed ID: 31907578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sternal foramina: incidence in Greek population, anatomy and clinical considerations.
    Paraskevas G; Tzika M; Anastasopoulos N; Kitsoulis P; Sofidis G; Natsis K
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2015 Sep; 37(7):845-51. PubMed ID: 25552238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalence and morphometry of sternal and xiphoid foramen: a meta-analysis on 16,666 subjects.
    Pasieka P; Pasieka PM; Komosa A; Barnowska A; Pękala J; Malinowski K; Tomaszewski K
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2023 May; 45(5):623-635. PubMed ID: 36918418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency of sternal foramen evaluated by MDCT: a minor variation of great relevance.
    Babinski MA; de Lemos L; Babinski MS; Gonçalves MV; De Paula RC; Fernandes RM
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2015 Apr; 37(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 25023390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the postnatal development of the sternum and sternal variations using multidetector CT.
    Bayaroğulları H; Yengil E; Davran R; Ağlagül E; Karazincir S; Balcı A
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2014; 20(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 24100061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Double sternal foramina in a dried sternum: a rare normal variant and its radiologic assessment.
    Paraskevas GK; Tzika M; Natsis K
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2016 Oct; 38(8):991-3. PubMed ID: 26988088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the morphological characteristic and sex differences of sternum by multi-detector computed tomography.
    Ateşoğlu S; Deniz M; Uslu AI
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2018; 77(3):489-497. PubMed ID: 29345718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The safe zone for blinded sternal interventions based on CT evaluation of midline congenital sternal foramina.
    Boruah DK; Prakash A; Yadav RR; Dhingani DD; Achar S; Augustine A; Mahanta K
    Skeletal Radiol; 2016 Dec; 45(12):1619-1628. PubMed ID: 27629288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphological variations of the anterior thoracic skeleton and their forensic significance: radiographic findings in a Spanish autopsy sample.
    Macaluso PJ; Lucena J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Aug; 241():220.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24933632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Morphometric analysis of variation in the sternum with sex and age.
    Weaver AA; Schoell SL; Nguyen CM; Lynch SK; Stitzel JD
    J Morphol; 2014 Nov; 275(11):1284-99. PubMed ID: 24935890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of 4th intercostal space using sternal notch to xiphoid length for accurate electrocardiogram lead placement.
    Day K; Oliva I; Krupinski E; Marcus F
    J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(6):1058-61. PubMed ID: 26324175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computed tomography of the normal sternum.
    Goodman LR; Teplick SK; Kay H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Aug; 141(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 6603107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cleft sternum and sternal foramen.
    Fokin AA
    Chest Surg Clin N Am; 2000 May; 10(2):261-76. PubMed ID: 10803333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anatomic evaluation of the xiphoid process with 64-row multidetector computed tomography.
    Akin K; Kosehan D; Topcu A; Koktener A
    Skeletal Radiol; 2011 Apr; 40(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 20721551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.