These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28398121)

  • 21. A comparison of group and individual remembering: does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?
    Basden BH; Basden DR; Bryner S; Thomas RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1176-91. PubMed ID: 9293628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What forgetting tells us about remembering: the influence of top-down control on hemispheric asymmetries in verbal memory.
    Tat MJ; Azuma T
    Laterality; 2015; 20(2):171-90. PubMed ID: 25139497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The joint influence of collaboration and part-set cueing.
    Kelley MR; Pentz C; Reysen MB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1977-85. PubMed ID: 24460096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is the survival-processing memory advantage due to richness of encoding?
    Röer JP; Bell R; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1294-302. PubMed ID: 23244053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of survival processing on memory for pictures depends on how memory is tested.
    Dewhurst SA; Anderson RJ; O'Connor RJ; Dean GM
    Memory; 2023 Apr; 31(4):502-508. PubMed ID: 36705639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of information distribution on collaborative inhibition.
    Meade ML; Gigone D
    Memory; 2011 Jul; 19(5):417-28. PubMed ID: 21714744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Your words are my words: effects of acting together on encoding.
    Eskenazi T; Doerrfeld A; Logan GD; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):1026-34. PubMed ID: 23035698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Picturing survival memories: enhanced memory after fitness-relevant processing occurs for verbal and visual stimuli.
    Otgaar H; Smeets T; van Bergen S
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 19966235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Collaborative inhibition is due to the product, not the process, of recalling in groups.
    Wright DB; Klumpp A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):1080-3. PubMed ID: 15875979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adaptive memory: survival processing enhances retention.
    Nairne JS; Thompson SR; Pandeirada JN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):263-73. PubMed ID: 17352610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inhibitory control in memory: evidence for negative priming in free recall.
    Marsh JE; Beaman CP; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1377-88. PubMed ID: 22468802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neurocognitive mechanisms of collaborative recall.
    Montoro-Membila N; Maswood R; Molina B; Rajaram S; Bajo T
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2022 Sep; 193():107639. PubMed ID: 35598824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adaptive memory: determining the proximate mechanisms responsible for the memorial advantages of survival processing.
    Burns DJ; Burns SA; Hwang AJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):206-18. PubMed ID: 21244114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Collaborative recall of details of an emotional film.
    Wessel I; Zandstra AR; Hengeveld HM; Moulds ML
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):437-44. PubMed ID: 24628679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Investigations of a reproductive processing advantage in memory.
    Derringer CJ; Scofield JE; Kostic B
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Aug; 45(6):983-1001. PubMed ID: 28462485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of multiple trials and computer-mediated communication on collaborative and individual semantic recall.
    Hinds JM; Payne SJ
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):415-423. PubMed ID: 28750599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Source-constrained retrieval and survival processing.
    Nairne JS; Pandeirada JN; VanArsdall JE; Blunt JR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 25092224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reexamination of mood-mediation hypothesis of background-music-dependent effects in free recall.
    Isarida TK; Kubota T; Nakajima S; Isarida T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):533-543. PubMed ID: 26821817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Correction of false memory for associated word lists by collaborating groups.
    Weigold A; Russell EJ; Natera SN
    Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 24934009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information.
    Kang SH; McDermott KB; Cohen SM
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1151-6. PubMed ID: 18927033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.