These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28399611)

  • 41. Feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of the Extra Wide Angle View (EWAVE) colonoscope for the detection of colorectal lesions.
    Bronzwaer MES; Dekker E; Weingart V; Groth S; Pioche M; Rivory J; Beyna T; Neuhaus H; Ponchon T; Allescher H; Fockens P; Rösch T
    Endoscopy; 2018 Jan; 50(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 29132174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Diagnostic yield and miss rate of EndoRings in an organized colorectal cancer screening program: the SMART (Study Methodology for ADR-Related Technology) trial.
    Hassan C; Senore C; Manes G; Fuccio L; Iacopini F; Ricciardiello L; Anderloni A; Frazzoni L; Ballanti R; de Nucci G; Colussi D; Redaelli D; Lorenzetti R; Devani M; Arena I; Grossi C; Andrei F; Balestrazzi E; Sharma P; Rex DK; Repici A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):583-590.e1. PubMed ID: 30365984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Should Assessment of Quality Indicator of Colonoscopy Be Varied Depending on the Colonoscopic Technique Level?
    Choung BS; Kim SH; Yoo KB; Seo SY; Kim IH; Lee SO; Lee ST; Kim SW
    Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(3):731-6. PubMed ID: 26576553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Missed adenomas with behind-folds visualizing colonoscopy technologies compared with standard colonoscopy: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized back-to-back tandem colonoscopy studies.
    Brand EC; Dik VK; van Oijen MGH; Siersema PD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Aug; 86(2):376-385.e2. PubMed ID: 28069476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy: Is Indication a Predictor?
    Yang PF; Wong SW
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Apr; 26(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 26813239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Adenoma Detection Rate in Asymptomatic Patients with Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests.
    Kligman E; Li W; Eckert GJ; Kahi C
    Dig Dis Sci; 2018 May; 63(5):1167-1172. PubMed ID: 29468377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Williet N; Tournier Q; Vernet C; Dumas O; Rinaldi L; Roblin X; Phelip JM; Pioche M
    Endoscopy; 2018 Sep; 50(9):846-860. PubMed ID: 29698990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
    Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. New technologies improve adenoma detection rate, adenoma miss rate, and polyp detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Castaneda D; Popov VB; Verheyen E; Wander P; Gross SA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Aug; 88(2):209-222.e11. PubMed ID: 29614263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Linked-color imaging versus white-light colonoscopy in an organized colorectal cancer screening program.
    Paggi S; Radaelli F; Senore C; Maselli R; Amato A; Andrisani G; Di Matteo F; Cecinato P; Grillo S; Sereni G; Sassatelli R; Manfredi G; Alicante S; Buscarini E; Canova D; Milan L; Pallini P; Iwatate M; Rondonotti E; Repici A; Hassan C
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Sep; 92(3):723-730. PubMed ID: 32502550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Randomized control trial of adenoma detection rate in Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus transparent hood-assisted colonoscopy.
    Imaeda H; Yamaoka M; Ohgo H; Soma H; Ashitani K; Miyaguchi K; Tsuzuki Y; Hosoe N; Nakamoto H
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1492-1496. PubMed ID: 31254485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Detectability of colorectal neoplastic lesions using a novel endoscopic system with blue laser imaging: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Ikematsu H; Sakamoto T; Togashi K; Yoshida N; Hisabe T; Kiriyama S; Matsuda K; Hayashi Y; Matsuda T; Osera S; Kaneko K; Utano K; Naito Y; Ishihara H; Kato M; Yoshimura K; Ishikawa H; Yamamoto H; Saito Y
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Aug; 86(2):386-394. PubMed ID: 28147226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Improved adenoma detection with linked color imaging technology compared to white-light colonoscopy.
    Lovász BD; Szalai M; Oczella L; Finta Á; Dubravcsik Z; Madácsy L
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 55(7):877-883. PubMed ID: 32657195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Linked color imaging, mucosal exposure device, their combination, and standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized trial.
    Aniwan S; Vanduangden K; Kerr SJ; Piyachaturawat P; Jangsirikul S; Luangsukrerk T; Kulpatcharapong S; Tiankanon K; Kongtab N; Wisedopas N; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Nov; 94(5):969-977. PubMed ID: 34081966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in comparison with regular colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lee YT; Lai LH; Hui AJ; Wong VW; Ching JY; Wong GL; Wu JC; Chan HL; Leung WK; Lau JY; Sung JJ; Chan FK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jan; 104(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 19098847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Lower adenoma miss rate with FUSE vs. conventional colonoscopy with proximal retroflexion: a randomized back-to-back trial.
    Papanikolaou IS; Apostolopoulos P; Tziatzios G; Vlachou E; Sioulas AD; Polymeros D; Karameris A; Panayiotides I; Alexandrakis G; Dimitriadis GD; Triantafyllou K
    Endoscopy; 2017 May; 49(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 28107765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Effect of Linked Color Imaging for Adenoma Detection. A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.
    Wang J; Ye C; Wu K; Fei S
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2022 Mar; 31(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 35306544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopy could improve adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Jian HX; Feng BC; Zhang Y; Qu JY; Li YY; Zuo XL
    J Dig Dis; 2019 Nov; 20(11):578-588. PubMed ID: 31429214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.
    Chung SJ; Kim D; Song JH; Park MJ; Kim YS; Kim JS; Jung HC; Song IS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 20493487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.