237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28400513)
1. Determining the factors driving selective effects of new nonsynonymous mutations.
Huber CD; Kim BY; Marsden CD; Lohmueller KE
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Apr; 114(17):4465-4470. PubMed ID: 28400513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of new mutations on fitness: insights from models and data.
Bataillon T; Bailey SF
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2014 Jul; 1320(1):76-92. PubMed ID: 24891070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inferring Genome-Wide Correlations of Mutation Fitness Effects between Populations.
Huang X; Fortier AL; Coffman AJ; Struck TJ; Irby MN; James JE; León-Burguete JE; Ragsdale AP; Gutenkunst RN
Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Sep; 38(10):4588-4602. PubMed ID: 34043790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inference of the Distribution of Selection Coefficients for New Nonsynonymous Mutations Using Large Samples.
Kim BY; Huber CD; Lohmueller KE
Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):345-361. PubMed ID: 28249985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A method for inferring the rate of occurrence and fitness effects of advantageous mutations.
Schneider A; Charlesworth B; Eyre-Walker A; Keightley PD
Genetics; 2011 Dec; 189(4):1427-37. PubMed ID: 21954160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of models to infer the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations.
Kousathanas A; Keightley PD
Genetics; 2013 Apr; 193(4):1197-208. PubMed ID: 23341416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Full Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Amino Acid Mutations Across Great Apes.
Castellano D; Macià MC; Tataru P; Bataillon T; Munch K
Genetics; 2019 Nov; 213(3):953-966. PubMed ID: 31488516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The evolutionarily stable distribution of fitness effects.
Rice DP; Good BH; Desai MM
Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):321-9. PubMed ID: 25762525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A null model for the distribution of fitness effects of mutations.
Cotto O; Day T
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Jun; 120(23):e2218200120. PubMed ID: 37252948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inference of Distribution of Fitness Effects and Proportion of Adaptive Substitutions from Polymorphism Data.
Tataru P; Mollion M; Glémin S; Bataillon T
Genetics; 2017 Nov; 207(3):1103-1119. PubMed ID: 28951530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Between but Not Within-Species Variation in the Distribution of Fitness Effects.
James J; Kastally C; Budde KB; González-Martínez SC; Milesi P; Pyhäjärvi T; Lascoux M;
Mol Biol Evol; 2023 Nov; 40(11):. PubMed ID: 37832225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.
Keightley PD; Eyre-Walker A
Genetics; 2007 Dec; 177(4):2251-61. PubMed ID: 18073430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A general multivariate extension of Fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species.
Martin G; Lenormand T
Evolution; 2006 May; 60(5):893-907. PubMed ID: 16817531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From Drift to Draft: How Much Do Beneficial Mutations Actually Contribute to Predictions of Ohta's Slightly Deleterious Model of Molecular Evolution?
Chen J; Glémin S; Lascoux M
Genetics; 2020 Apr; 214(4):1005-1018. PubMed ID: 32015019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inference of the distribution of fitness effects of mutations is affected by single nucleotide polymorphism filtering methods, sample size and population structure.
Andersson BA; Zhao W; Haller BC; Brännström Å; Wang XR
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Oct; 23(7):1589-1603. PubMed ID: 37340611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The fitness effect of mutations across environments: Fisher's geometrical model with multiple optima.
Martin G; Lenormand T
Evolution; 2015 Jun; 69(6):1433-1447. PubMed ID: 25908434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Triallelic Population Genomics for Inferring Correlated Fitness Effects of Same Site Nonsynonymous Mutations.
Ragsdale AP; Coffman AJ; Hsieh P; Struck TJ; Gutenkunst RN
Genetics; 2016 May; 203(1):513-23. PubMed ID: 27029732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A bayesian MCMC approach to assess the complete distribution of fitness effects of new mutations: uncovering the potential for adaptive walks in challenging environments.
Bank C; Hietpas RT; Wong A; Bolon DN; Jensen JD
Genetics; 2014 Mar; 196(3):841-52. PubMed ID: 24398421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of non-neutral synonymous mutations when inferring selection on non-synonymous mutations.
Zurita AMI; Kyriazis CC; Lohmueller KE
bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38370782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sex differences in deleterious mutational effects in Drosophila melanogaster: combining quantitative and population genetic insights.
Ruzicka F; Connallon T; Reuter M
Genetics; 2021 Nov; 219(3):. PubMed ID: 34740242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
