These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28401164)

  • 21. Assessment of Gender Dimorphism on Sagittal Cephalometry in Pakistani Population.
    Qamruddin I; Alam MK; Shahid F; Tanveer S; Mukhtiar M; Asim Z
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 May; 26(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 27225144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.
    Rodriguez-Cardenas YA; Arriola-Guillen LE; Flores-Mir C
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):46-53. PubMed ID: 25628079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of two methods of dental age estimation in 7-15-year-old Malays.
    Mani SA; Naing L; John J; Samsudin AR
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):380-8. PubMed ID: 18284472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dental age estimation using Demirjian and Willems methods: cross sectional study on children from the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
    Ambarkova V; Galić I; Vodanović M; Biočina-Lukenda D; Brkić H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jan; 234():187.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24262808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Correlating skeletal and dental developmental stages using radiographic parameters.
    Cericato GO; Franco A; Bittencourt MA; Nunes MA; Paranhos LR
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Aug; 42():13-8. PubMed ID: 27219112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dental Age Estimation According to European Formula and Willems Method: Comparison Between Children With and Without Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Markovic E; Marinkovic N; Zelic K; Milovanovic P; Djuric M; Nedeljkovic N
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2021 May; 58(5):612-618. PubMed ID: 33535820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Dental and skeletal age in children with growth hormone deficiency treated with growth hormone--preliminary report].
    Kawala B; Matthews-Brzozowska T; Bieniasz J; Noczyńska A
    Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab; 2007; 13(4):210-2. PubMed ID: 18042317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Metric and angular variables of the mandibular ramus on panoramic radiographs, as indicators for chronologic age].
    Espina-Fereira A; Ortega AI; Barrios FA; Maldonado YJ; Fereira JL
    Invest Clin; 2007 Dec; 48(4):403-18. PubMed ID: 18271388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.
    Trivedi R; Bhattacharya A; Mehta F; Patel D; Parekh H; Gandhi V
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():3. PubMed ID: 25769138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dental age table for a sample of Pakistani children.
    Sukhia RH; Fida M; Azam SI
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 21135036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relationship between dental age according to Demirjian and cervical vertebrae maturity in Polish children.
    Różyło-Kalinowska I; Kolasa--Rączka A; Kalinowski P
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 20558591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Cephalometric study of the effect of orthodontic treatment on the mandible in Class II, Division 1 patients].
    Atta JY; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2135330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Correlation between dental maturity and cervical vertebral maturity.
    Chen J; Hu H; Guo J; Liu Z; Liu R; Li F; Zou S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Dec; 110(6):777-83. PubMed ID: 21112534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
    Georgalis K; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relation between centric slide and Angle's classification.
    Afzal A; Qamruddin I
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Aug; 15(8):481-4. PubMed ID: 16202359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dental maturity amongst various vertical and sagittal facial patterns.
    Sukhia RH; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Apr; 20(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 20392395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
    Bielawska H
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of Demirjian's four dental development methods for forensic age estimation in South Australian sub-adults.
    Flood SJ; Franklin D; Turlach BA; McGeachie J
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Oct; 20(7):875-83. PubMed ID: 24112340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
    Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.