BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28402133)

  • 1. JOURNAL CLUB: Structured Feedback From Patients on Actual Radiology Reports: A Novel Approach to Improve Reporting Practices.
    Gunn AJ; Gilcrease-Garcia B; Mangano MD; Sahani DV; Boland GW; Choy G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1262-1270. PubMed ID: 28402133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Journal Club: Structured radiology reports are more complete and more effective than unstructured reports.
    Marcovici PA; Taylor GA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1265-71. PubMed ID: 25415704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structured feedback from referring physicians: a novel approach to quality improvement in radiology reporting.
    Gunn AJ; Alabre CI; Bennett SE; Kautzky M; Krakower T; Palamara K; Choy G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):853-7. PubMed ID: 24059375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patients' Use and Evaluation of an Online System to Annotate Radiology Reports with Lay Language Definitions.
    Cook TS; Oh SC; Kahn CE
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1169-1174. PubMed ID: 28433519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of an Online Crowdsourcing Platform to Assess Patient Comprehension of Radiology Reports and Colloquialisms.
    Cho JK; Zafar HM; Cook TS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1316-1320. PubMed ID: 32208006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. JOURNAL CLUB: Structured Reporting: The Voice of the Customer in an Ongoing Debate About the Future of Radiology Reporting.
    Heye T; Gysin V; Boll DT; Merkle EM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):964-970. PubMed ID: 30240305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Role of Report Comparison, Analysis, and Discrepancy Categorization in Resident Education.
    Harari AA; Conti MB; Bokhari SA; Staib LH; Taylor CR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Dec; 207(6):1223-1231. PubMed ID: 27657361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpretive Differences Between Patients and Radiologists Regarding the Diagnostic Confidence Associated With Commonly Used Phrases in the Radiology Report.
    Mityul MI; Gilcrease-Garcia B; Searleman A; Demertzis JL; Gunn AJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):123-126. PubMed ID: 29023151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Traditional text-only versus multimedia-enhanced radiology reporting: referring physicians' perceptions of value.
    Sadigh G; Hertweck T; Kao C; Wood P; Hughes D; Henry TS; Duszak R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 May; 12(5):519-24. PubMed ID: 25622764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coverage and Readability of Information Resources to Help Patients Understand Radiology Reports.
    Martin-Carreras T; Kahn CE
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Dec; 15(12):1681-1686. PubMed ID: 29310924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiologists' role in the communication of imaging examination results to patients: perceptions and preferences of patients.
    Mangano MD; Rahman A; Choy G; Sahani DV; Boland GW; Gunn AJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):1034-9. PubMed ID: 25341142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PORTER: a Prototype System for Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporting.
    Oh SC; Cook TS; Kahn CE
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Aug; 29(4):450-4. PubMed ID: 26856348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. State of structured reporting in radiology, a survey.
    Powell DK; Silberzweig JE
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 25442793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discordance rates between preliminary and final radiology reports on cross-sectional imaging studies at a level 1 trauma center.
    Stevens KJ; Griffiths KL; Rosenberg J; Mahadevan S; Zatz LM; Leung AN
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):1217-26. PubMed ID: 18790392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trainee report dashboard: tool for enhancing feedback to radiology trainees about their reports.
    Gorniak RJ; Flanders AE; Sharpe RE
    Radiographics; 2013; 33(7):2105-13. PubMed ID: 23988632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Structured reporting in radiology].
    Hackländer T
    Radiologe; 2013 Jul; 53(7):613-7. PubMed ID: 23595099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Patient Experience in Radiology: Observations From Over 3,500 Patient Feedback Reports in a Single Institution.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Pysarenko K
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11):1371-1377. PubMed ID: 27318577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Reporting initiatives. An update on treatment in radiology].
    Hempel JM; Pinto dos Santos D; Kloeckner R; Dueber C; Mildenberger P
    Radiologe; 2014 Jul; 54(7):696-9. PubMed ID: 24989877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased error rates in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents working more than 10 consecutive hours overnight.
    Ruutiainen AT; Durand DJ; Scanlon MH; Itri JN
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 23452475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiology reports: a quantifiable and objective textual approach.
    Scott JA; Palmer EL
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1185-91. PubMed ID: 26169580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.