These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28403158)

  • 1. What can we learn from corporate sustainability reporting? Deriving propositions for research and practice from over 9,500 corporate sustainability reports published between 1999 and 2015 using topic modelling technique.
    Székely N; Vom Brocke J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0174807. PubMed ID: 28403158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of corporate sustainability reporting tools (SRTs).
    Siew RY
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Dec; 164():180-95. PubMed ID: 26379255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Integrated Scorecard in support of corporate sustainability strategies.
    Journeault M
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Nov; 182():214-229. PubMed ID: 27479238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Environmental Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting by Large Health Care Organizations.
    Senay E; Landrigan PJ
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Aug; 1(4):e180975. PubMed ID: 30646093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proactive sustainability strategy and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of sustainability control systems.
    Wijethilake C
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 196():569-582. PubMed ID: 28351823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry.
    Wagner M
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Jul; 76(2):105-18. PubMed ID: 15939122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Common and conflicting interests in the engagements between conservation organizations and corporations.
    Robinson JG
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Dec; 26(6):967-77. PubMed ID: 22900529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cross-sectional analysis of reported corporate environmental sustainability practices.
    Cowan DM; Dopart P; Ferracini T; Sahmel J; Merryman K; Gaffney S; Paustenbach DJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3):524-38. PubMed ID: 20850490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sustainability reporting in public sector organisations: Exploring the relation between the reporting process and organisational change management for sustainability.
    Domingues AR; Lozano R; Ceulemans K; Ramos TB
    J Environ Manage; 2017 May; 192():292-301. PubMed ID: 28183029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing corporate planning of future sustainability initiatives in private healthcare organizations.
    Rodriguez R; Svensson G; Wood G
    Eval Program Plann; 2020 Dec; 83():101869. PubMed ID: 32956947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cooperation between scientists, NGOs and industry in support of sustainable fisheries: the South African hake Merluccius spp. trawl fishery experience.
    Field JG; Attwood CG; Jarre A; Sink K; Atkinson LJ; Petersen S
    J Fish Biol; 2013 Oct; 83(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 24090560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Portrayal of sustainability principles in the mission statements and on home pages of the world's largest organizations.
    Garnett ST; Lawes MJ; James R; Bigland K; Zander KK
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 26306732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Work in corporate sustainability policies: the contribution of ergonomics.
    Bolis I; Brunoro CM; Sznelwar LI
    Work; 2014; 49(3):417-31. PubMed ID: 25267713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lessons on corporate "sustainability" disclosure from Deepwater Horizon.
    Lewis S
    New Solut; 2011; 21(2):197-214. PubMed ID: 21733800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring work-related issues on corporate sustainability.
    Brunoro CM; Bolis I; Sznelwar LI
    Work; 2015; 53(3):643-59. PubMed ID: 26890588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards a new paradigm: Activity level balanced sustainability reporting.
    Samudhram A; Siew EG; Sinnakkannu J; Yeow PH
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Nov; 57():94-104. PubMed ID: 27029522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sustainability performance evaluation: Literature review and future directions.
    Büyüközkan G; Karabulut Y
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 217():253-267. PubMed ID: 29605780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ergonomics and education as a strategy for sustainable development in business.
    Silveira DM; Brandão EL
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3701-8. PubMed ID: 22317285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corporate Sustainability Paradox Management: A Systematic Review and Future Agenda.
    Luo BN; Tang Y; Chen EW; Li S; Luo D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():579272. PubMed ID: 33329232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic literature review on corporate sustainability: contributions, barriers, innovations and future possibilities.
    de Oliveira UR; Menezes RP; Fernandes VA
    Environ Dev Sustain; 2023 Jan; ():1-35. PubMed ID: 36687736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.