BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28403960)

  • 1. Anatomical causes of difficult embryo transfer during in vitro fertilization.
    Larue L; Keromnes G; Massari A; Roche C; Bouret D; Cassuto NG; Ayel JP
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Jan; 46(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 28403960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro fertilization outcome relative to embryo transfer difficulty: a novel approach to the forbidding cervix.
    Noyes N; Licciardi F; Grifo J; Krey L; Berkeley A
    Fertil Steril; 1999 Aug; 72(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 10438992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hysteroscopy in a program of in vitro fertilization.
    Goldenberg M; Bider D; Ben-Rafael Z; Dor J; Levran D; Oelsner G; Mashiach S
    J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf; 1991 Dec; 8(6):336-8. PubMed ID: 1770274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hysteroscopic cervical canal shaving: a new therapy for cervical stenosis before embryo transfer in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    Noyes N
    Fertil Steril; 1999 May; 71(5):965-6. PubMed ID: 10231067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Successful treatment of cervical stenosis with hysteroscopic canalization before embryo transfer in patients undergoing IVF: a case series.
    Pabuccu R; Ceyhan ST; Onalan G; Goktolga U; Ercan CM; Selam B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(5):436-8. PubMed ID: 16213431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Impact of embryo transfer techniques on implantation rates].
    Frydman R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2004 Feb; 33(1 Pt 2):S36-9. PubMed ID: 14968044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Septate, subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI.
    Tomaževič T; Ban-Frangež H; Virant-Klun I; Verdenik I; Požlep B; Vrtačnik-Bokal E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):700-5. PubMed ID: 20864409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome of assisted reproduction in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a prospective observational study.
    Prior M; Richardson A; Asif S; Polanski L; Parris-Larkin M; Chandler J; Fogg L; Jassal P; Thornton JG; Raine-Fenning NJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 29055072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity on in vitro fertilization outcome.
    Ivanovski M; Damcevski N; Radevska B; Doicev G
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012; 51(3):59-67. PubMed ID: 23236668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a strategy for difficult embryo transfers from a prospective series of 2,046 transfers.
    Larue L; Bernard L; Moulin J; Massari A; Cassuto NG; Bouret D; Keromnes G
    F S Rep; 2021 Mar; 2(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 34223272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound measurement of the uterocervical angle before embryo transfer: a prospective controlled study.
    Sallam HN; Agameya AF; Rahman AF; Ezzeldin F; Sallam AN
    Hum Reprod; 2002 Jul; 17(7):1767-72. PubMed ID: 12093837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hysteroscopic cervical features associated with difficult embryo transfer in unselected patients undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    Ou YC; Huang KH; Lan KC
    Biomed J; 2022 Jun; 45(3):557-564. PubMed ID: 34237454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The value of hysteroscopy in elderly women prior to in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET): a comparative study.
    Dicker D; Goldman JA; Ashkenazi J; Feldberg D; Dekel A
    J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf; 1990 Oct; 7(5):267-70. PubMed ID: 2254691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cannulation of a resistant internal os with the malleable outer sheath of a coaxial soft embryo transfer catheter does not affect in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome.
    Silberstein T; Weitzen S; Frankfurter D; Trimarchi JR; Keefe DL; Plosker SM
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Nov; 82(5):1402-6. PubMed ID: 15533367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of Versapoint to refashion the cervical canal to overcome unusually difficult embryo transfers and improve in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome: A case series.
    Mahajan N; Gupta I
    J Hum Reprod Sci; 2011 Jan; 4(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 21772733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of office hysteroscopy in in vitro fertilization.
    Shamma FN; Lee G; Gutmann JN; Lavy G
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Dec; 58(6):1237-9. PubMed ID: 1459277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Location of the embryo-transfer catheter guide before the internal uterine os improves the outcome of in vitro fertilization.
    Abdelmassih VG; Neme RM; Dozortsev D; Abdelmassih S; Diamond MP; Abdelmassih R
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):499-503. PubMed ID: 17509576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transcervical placement of a Malecot catheter after hysteroscopic evaluation provides for easier entry into the endometrial cavity for women with histories of difficult intrauterine inseminations and/or embryo transfers: a prospective case series.
    Yanushpolsky EH; Ginsburg ES; Fox JH; Stewart EA
    Fertil Steril; 2000 Feb; 73(2):402-5. PubMed ID: 10685550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical dilatation with hygroscopic rods prior to ovarian stimulation facilitates embryo transfer.
    Serhal P; Ranieri DM; Khadum I; Wakim RA
    Hum Reprod; 2003 Dec; 18(12):2618-20. PubMed ID: 14645181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrospective evaluation of pregnancy outcomes and clinical implications of 34 Han Chinese women with unicornuate uterus who received IVF-ET or ICSI-ET treatment.
    Liu J; Wu Y; Xu S; Su D; Han Y; Wu X
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Nov; 37(8):1020-1024. PubMed ID: 28657383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.