These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28403965)

  • 1. Understanding fetal physiology and second line monitoring during labor.
    Garabedian C; De Jonckheere J; Butruille L; Deruelle P; Storme L; Houfflin-Debarge V
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 46(2):113-117. PubMed ID: 28403965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients.
    Kwee A; van der Hoorn-van den Beld CW; Veerman J; Dekkers AH; Visser GH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 15280112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. National survey of routines for intrapartum fetal monitoring in Norway.
    Kaasen A; Aanstad KJ; Pay ASD; Økland I; Blix E
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Mar; 98(3):390-395. PubMed ID: 30375643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management.
    Pinas A; Chandraharan E
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():33-47. PubMed ID: 26165747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiotocography alone vs. cardiotocography with ST segment analysis for intrapartum fetal monitoring in women with late-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial.
    Puertas A; Góngora J; Valverde M; Revelles L; Manzanares S; Carrillo MP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():213-217. PubMed ID: 30731334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ST analysis of fetal electrocardiography in labor.
    Amer-Wåhlin I; Maršál K
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Feb; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 21115414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does ST analysis have a place in electronic fetal monitoring?
    Turnbull TL; Mol BW; Matthews G; Wilkinson C; Chandraharan E; Kuah S
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Mar; 30(5):520-524. PubMed ID: 27098566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New FIGO and Swedish intrapartum cardiotocography classification systems incorporated in the fetal ECG ST analysis (STAN) interpretation algorithm: agreements and discrepancies in cardiotocography classification and evaluation of significant ST events.
    Olofsson P; Norén H; Carlsson A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Feb; 97(2):219-228. PubMed ID: 29215160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined cardiotocographic and ST event analysis: A review.
    Amer-Wahlin I; Kwee A
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():48-61. PubMed ID: 26206514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrapartum heart rate ambiguity: a comparison of cardiotocogram and abdominal fetal electrocardiogram with maternal electrocardiogram.
    Reinhard J; Hayes-Gill BR; Schiermeier S; Hatzmann H; Heinrich TM; Louwen F
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23328351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is the fetus fit for labor? Introducing fast-and-frugal trees (FFTrees) to simplify triage of women for STAN monitoring: An interobserver agreement comparison with traditional classification.
    Pereira S; Bakker P; Zaima A; Ghi T; Kessler J; Timonen S; Vayssière C; Löser K; Holmberg K; Jacquemyn Y; Chandraharan E; Wertheim D; Olofsson P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Jan; 103(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37890863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misidentification of maternal heart rate as fetal on cardiotocography during the second stage of labor: the role of the fetal electrocardiograph.
    Nurani R; Chandraharan E; Lowe V; Ugwumadu A; Arulkumaran S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1428-32. PubMed ID: 22881463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The intrapartum deceleration in center stage: a physiologic approach to the interpretation of fetal heart rate changes in labor.
    Westgate JA; Wibbens B; Bennet L; Wassink G; Parer JT; Gunn AJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):236.e1-11. PubMed ID: 17826402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to cardiotocography to predict fetal acidosis in labor--a multi-center, case controlled study.
    Norén H; Luttkus AK; Stupin JH; Blad S; Arulkumaran S; Erkkola R; Luzietti R; Visser GH; Yli B; Rosén KG
    J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 17685855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Errors and pitfalls in reading the cardiotocographic tracing.
    Di Tommaso M; Seravalli V; Petraglia F
    Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Apr; 71(2):91-96. PubMed ID: 30318881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comments on past and present situation of intensive monitoring of the fetus during labor.
    Saling E
    J Perinat Med; 1996; 24(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8708934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. European Community multi-Center Trial "Fetal ECG Analysis During Labor": ST plus CTG analysis.
    Luzietti R; Erkkola R; Hasbargen U; Mattsson LA; Thoulon JM; Rosén KG
    J Perinat Med; 1999; 27(6):431-40. PubMed ID: 10732301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fetal short time variation during labor: a non-invasive alternative to fetal scalp pH measurements?
    Schiermeier S; Reinhard J; Hatzmann H; Zimmermann RC; Westhof G
    J Perinat Med; 2009; 37(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 19492916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using fetal scalp stimulation with Doppler ultrasonography to enhance intermittent auscultation in low-resource settings: a diagnostic trial from Tanzania.
    Goodman DM; Mlay P; Thielman N; Small MJ; Schmitt JW
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Feb; 19(1):71. PubMed ID: 30760224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computerised fetal heart rate analysis in labour--effect of sampling rate.
    Chang A; Sahota DS; Reed NN; James DK; Mohajer MP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1995 Apr; 59(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 7657005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.