These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28404512)
61. Characterizing the variability of food waste quality: A need for efficient valorisation through anaerobic digestion. Fisgativa H; Tremier A; Dabert P Waste Manag; 2016 Apr; 50():264-74. PubMed ID: 26868845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Influence of mesophilic and thermophilic conditions on the anaerobic digestion of food waste: Focus on the microbial activity and removal of long chain fatty acids. Guo X; Kang K; Shang G; Yu X; Qiu L; Sun G Waste Manag Res; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1106-1112. PubMed ID: 30306837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Dry anaerobic digestion of food waste under mesophilic conditions: performance and methanogenic community analysis. Cho SK; Im WT; Kim DH; Kim MH; Shin HS; Oh SE Bioresour Technol; 2013 Mar; 131():210-7. PubMed ID: 23347929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Enhancing degradation and biogas production during anaerobic digestion of food waste using alkali pretreatment. Linyi C; Yujie Q; Buqing C; Chenglong W; Shaohong Z; Renglu C; Shaohua Y; Lan Y; Zhiju L Environ Res; 2020 Sep; 188():109743. PubMed ID: 32592938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Review on solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass and organic solid waste. Khuntia HK; Paliwal A; Kumar DR; Chanakya HN Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jun; 194(7):514. PubMed ID: 35726107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Performance comparison between mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic reactors for treatment of palm oil mill effluent. Jeong JY; Son SM; Pyon JH; Park JY Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():122-8. PubMed ID: 24797939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of food waste: A comparison with single-stage digestions based on performance and energy balance. Xiao B; Qin Y; Zhang W; Wu J; Qiang H; Liu J; Li YY Bioresour Technol; 2018 Feb; 249():826-834. PubMed ID: 29136938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Inactivation of enteric indicator bacteria and system stability during dry co-digestion of food waste and pig manure. Jiang Y; Dennehy C; Lawlor PG; Hu Z; Zhan X; Gardiner GE Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jan; 612():293-302. PubMed ID: 28850849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. The influence of the total solid content on the stability of dry-thermophilic anaerobic digestion of rice straw and pig manure. Riya S; Suzuki K; Meng L; Zhou S; Terada A; Hosomi M Waste Manag; 2018 Jun; 76():350-356. PubMed ID: 29496383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Prediction of biogas production rate from dry anaerobic digestion of food waste: Process-based approach vs. recurrent neural network black-box model. Seo KW; Seo J; Kim K; Ji Lim S; Chung J Bioresour Technol; 2021 Dec; 341():125829. PubMed ID: 34474239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Comparison of thermophilic and mesophilic one-stage, batch, high-solids anaerobic digestion. Hegde G; Pullammanappallil P Environ Technol; 2007 Apr; 28(4):361-9. PubMed ID: 17500311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Localized mixing of anaerobic plug flow reactors. Khalil CA; Eraky MT; Ghanimeh S Water Res; 2021 Oct; 204():117588. PubMed ID: 34481287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Mesophilic and thermophilic temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion compared with single-stage mesophilic- and thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge. Song YC; Kwon SJ; Woo JH Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(7):1653-62. PubMed ID: 15026219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Improve biogas production from low-organic-content sludge through high-solids anaerobic co-digestion with food waste. Liu C; Li H; Zhang Y; Liu C Bioresour Technol; 2016 Nov; 219():252-260. PubMed ID: 27497086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Comparison of high-solids to liquid anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and green waste. Chen X; Yan W; Sheng K; Sanati M Bioresour Technol; 2014 Feb; 154():215-21. PubMed ID: 24398149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Meso- and thermophilic posttreatment of press water coming from a thermophilic municipal solid waste digester. Prem EM; Markt R; Wunderer M; Wagner AO Biotechnol Bioeng; 2024 Jan; 121(1):266-280. PubMed ID: 37902646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Anaerobic digestion of whole stillage from dry-grind corn ethanol plant under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Eskicioglu C; Kennedy KJ; Marin J; Strehler B Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):1079-86. PubMed ID: 20843681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Comparison of the mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of spent cow bedding in leach-bed reactors. Riggio S; Hernandéz-Shek MA; Torrijos M; Vives G; Esposito G; van Hullebusch ED; Steyer JP; Escudié R Bioresour Technol; 2017 Jun; 234():466-471. PubMed ID: 28336219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Effect of temperature on VFA's and biogas production in anaerobic solubilization of food waste. Komemoto K; Lim YG; Nagao N; Onoue Y; Niwa C; Toda T Waste Manag; 2009 Dec; 29(12):2950-5. PubMed ID: 19716284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Source separation and anaerobic co-digestion of blackwater and food waste for biogas production and nutrient recovery. Kamravamanesh D; Kokko M Water Sci Technol; 2024 Aug; 90(3):1082-1098. PubMed ID: 39141053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]