157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28404532)
1. Cost-effectiveness and cost utility of community screening for glaucoma in urban India.
John D; Parikh R
Public Health; 2017 Jul; 148():37-48. PubMed ID: 28404532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of community screening for glaucoma in rural India: a decision analytical model.
John D; Parikh R
Public Health; 2018 Feb; 155():142-151. PubMed ID: 29407529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Burr JM; Mowatt G; Hernández R; Siddiqui MA; Cook J; Lourenco T; Ramsay C; Vale L; Fraser C; Azuara-Blanco A; Deeks J; Cairns J; Wormald R; McPherson S; Rabindranath K; Grant A
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(41):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-190. PubMed ID: 17927922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cost-utility of telemedicine to screen for diabetic retinopathy in India.
Rachapelle S; Legood R; Alavi Y; Lindfield R; Sharma T; Kuper H; Polack S
Ophthalmology; 2013 Mar; 120(3):566-573. PubMed ID: 23211635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening for refractive error and fitting with spectacles in rural and urban India: cost-effectiveness.
Frick KD; Riva-Clement L; Shankar MB
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2009; 16(6):378-87. PubMed ID: 19995203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of population-based glaucoma screening in China: a decision-analytic Markov model.
Tang J; Liang Y; O'Neill C; Kee F; Jiang J; Congdon N
Lancet Glob Health; 2019 Jul; 7(7):e968-e978. PubMed ID: 31122906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health care cost and benefits of artificial intelligence-assisted population-based glaucoma screening for the elderly in remote areas of China: a cost-offset analysis.
Xiao X; Xue L; Ye L; Li H; He Y
BMC Public Health; 2021 Jun; 21(1):1065. PubMed ID: 34088286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Costing a community based screening programme for the detection of glaucoma.
Jones SJ; Vernon SA; Cater L; Henry DJ
Eye (Lond); 1990; 4 ( Pt 1)():98-102. PubMed ID: 2323483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Teleglaucoma Screening Device.
Thomas S; Hodge W; Malvankar-Mehta M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137913. PubMed ID: 26382956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic evaluation of combined population-based screening for multiple blindness-causing eye diseases in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Liu H; Li R; Zhang Y; Zhang K; Yusufu M; Liu Y; Mou D; Chen X; Tian J; Li H; Fan S; Tang J; Wang N
Lancet Glob Health; 2023 Mar; 11(3):e456-e465. PubMed ID: 36702141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of glaucoma screening in cataract camps versus opportunistic and passive screening in urban India: A study protocol.
Sabherwal S; John D; Dubey S; Mukherjee S; Menon GR; Majumdar A
F1000Res; 2019; 8():53. PubMed ID: 31131093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Costs of a community-based glaucoma detection programme: analysis of the Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project.
Pizzi LT; Waisbourd M; Hark L; Sembhi H; Lee P; Crews JE; Saaddine JB; Steele D; Katz LJ
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 102(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 28655730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The prevalence and its screening methods of primary open angle glaucoma in defined population-based study of rural and urban in Beijing].
Xu L; Chen JH; Li JJ; Luo L; Yang H; Zhang RX; Sun XY; Zheng YY; Song WX; Shi YY; Zhang SY; Sun BC; Zhao JL; Ma BR
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Nov; 40(11):726-32. PubMed ID: 15634477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence of primary angle-closure disease in an urban south Indian population and comparison with a rural population. The Chennai Glaucoma Study.
Vijaya L; George R; Arvind H; Baskaran M; Ve Ramesh S; Raju P; Kumaramanickavel G; McCarty C
Ophthalmology; 2008 Apr; 115(4):655-660.e1. PubMed ID: 17869343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic evaluation of screening for open-angle glaucoma.
Hernández RA; Burr JM; Vale LD;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 18400124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost effectiveness of a community based prevention and treatment of acute malnutrition programme in Mumbai slums, India.
Goudet S; Jayaraman A; Chanani S; Osrin D; Devleesschauwer B; Bogin B; Madise N; Griffiths P
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0205688. PubMed ID: 30412636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-utility analysis of screening for diabetic retinopathy in Japan: a probabilistic Markov modeling study.
Kawasaki R; Akune Y; Hiratsuka Y; Fukuhara S; Yamada M
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 22(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 25517603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The cost-effectiveness of routine office-based identification and subsequent medical treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma in the United States.
Rein DB; Wittenborn JS; Lee PP; Wirth KE; Sorensen SW; Hoerger TJ; Saaddine JB
Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):823-32. PubMed ID: 19285730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost effectiveness and cost utility of an organized screening programme for glaucoma.
Vaahtoranta-Lehtonen H; Tuulonen A; Aronen P; Sintonen H; Suoranta L; Kovanen N; Linna M; Läärä E; Malmivaara A
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Aug; 85(5):508-18. PubMed ID: 17655612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Open Angle Glaucoma Compared With Opportunistic Case Finding.
Anton A; Serrano D; Nolivos K; Fatti G; Zmuc N; Crespo C; Monleon-Getino T; Sotelo K; Morilla A; García V; Comas M; Castells X
J Glaucoma; 2023 Feb; 32(2):72-79. PubMed ID: 36696355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
