148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28405743)
1. Short interval between two Pap smears: effect on the result of the second smear? A prospective randomized trial.
Kolben TM; Bergauer F; Moeckel J; Boettcher B; Thaler CJ; Kolben T; Crispin A; Dannecker C; Mahner S; Gallwas J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 295(6):1427-1433. PubMed ID: 28405743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors related to inter-observer reproducibility of conventional Pap smear cytology: a multilevel analysis of smear and laboratory characteristics.
Baena A; Guevara E; Almonte M; Arias-Stella J; Sasieni P; Sanchez GI
Cytopathology; 2017 Jun; 28(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 28029192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in an organized screening program : a prospective randomized study.
Strander B; Andersson-Ellström A; Milsom I; Rådberg T; Ryd W
Cancer; 2007 Oct; 111(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 17724676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical cancer screening with liquid cytology in women with developmental disabilities.
Kavoussi SK; Smith YR; Ernst SD; Quint EH
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009; 18(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 19072727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant.
Uyar DS; Eltabbakh GH; Mount SL
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12713984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study.
Fremont-Smith M; Marino J; Griffin B; Spencer L; Bolick D
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 102(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 15386329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical Cancer Detection between Conventional and Liquid Based Cervical Cytology: a 6-Year Experience in Northern Bangkok Thailand.
Phaliwong P; Pariyawateekul P; Khuakoonratt N; Sirichai W; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 May; 19(5):1331-1336. PubMed ID: 29802695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural history of false-negative papanicolaou smears: a prospective study using screening colposcopy in addition to cytology.
Mannino JR
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1998 Oct; 98(10):542-6. PubMed ID: 9821735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the interval between papanicolaou tests influence the quality of cytology?
Jeronimo J; Khan MJ; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Cancer; 2005 Jun; 105(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 15822121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incidence of cytological abnormalities within 24 months of a normal cervical smear in Soweto, South Africa.
Adam Y; McIntyre JA; De Bruyn G
S Afr Med J; 2012 Nov; 103(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 23237122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liqui-Prep® versus conventional Papanicolaou smear to detect cervical cells abnormality by split-sample technique: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.
Jesdapatarakul S; Tangjitgamol S; Nguansangiam S; Manusirivithaya S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Jan; 39(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20063407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology by liquid based cytology in the antenatal care clinic, Thammasat University Hospital.
Khaengkhor P; Mairaing K; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Poomtavorn Y; Pattaraarchachai J; Bhamarapravatana K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Feb; 94(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 21534360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of cervical cytology with cervical histology.
Saha R; Thapa M
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2005; 3(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 18650580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL on Pap smear reports: management by repeat Pap smear, HPV DNA testing, or colposcopy?
Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Borgatta L; Buck H; Kramer L; Rubin R
J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 9487318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of gel lubricant on cervical cytology.
Charoenkwan K; Ninunanahaeminda K; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Thorner PS
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 19068667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Searching for an ideal cervical cancer screening model to reduce false-negative errors in a country with high prevalence of cervical cancer.
Song T; Seong SJ; Lee SK; Kim BR; Ju W; Kim KH; Nam K; Sim JC; Kim TJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):240-246. PubMed ID: 31340702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two tests for detecting carcinogenic HPV in women with Papanicolaou smear reports of ASCUS and LSIL.
Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Woodward L
J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9487319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of liquid-based cytology and Pap smear as a screening method for cervical cancer.
Zhu J; Norman I; Elfgren K; Gaberi V; Hagmar B; Hjerpe A; Andersson S
Oncol Rep; 2007 Jul; 18(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 17549362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association of Abnormal Pap Smear with Occult Cervical Stromal Invasion in Patients with Endometrial Cancer.
Khumthong K; Aue-Aungkul A; Kleebkaow P; Chumworathayi B; Temtanakitpaisan A; Nhokaew W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Sep; 20(9):2847-2850. PubMed ID: 31554386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
