204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28406040)
1. Seven-Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip Product.
Setford S; Grady M; Phillips S; Miller L; Mackintosh S; Cameron H; Corrigall K
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 28406040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence From a Long-Term, Systematic Post-Market Surveillance Program: Clinical Performance of a Hematocrit-Insensitive Blood Glucose Test Strip.
Setford S; Phillips S; Grady M
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 15(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 30730221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Seven-Year Clinical Surveillance Program Demonstrates Consistent MARD Accuracy Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip.
Setford S; Grady M; Mackintosh S; Donald R; Levy B
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1016-1023. PubMed ID: 29845873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing with Built-in Insulin Dose Advisor Based on ISO 15197:2013: System Accuracy and Hematocrit Influence.
Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Liebing C; Beer A; Flacke F; Haug C; Freckmann G
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Apr; 20(4):303-313. PubMed ID: 29664706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations.
Freckmann G; Schmid C; Baumstark A; Rutschmann M; Haug C; Heinemann L
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):885-94. PubMed ID: 25872965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Hematocrit Influence on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Based on ISO 15197:2013: Comparison of a Novel System With Five Systems With Different Hematocrit Ranges.
Hattemer A; Wardat S
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 12(2):333-340. PubMed ID: 29374966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of a new test strip for freestyle blood glucose monitoring systems.
Lock JP; Brazg R; Bernstein RM; Taylor E; Patel M; Ward J; Alva S; Chen T; Welsh Z; Amor W; Bhogal C; Ng R
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 Jan; 13(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21142975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers.
Brazg RL; Klaff LJ; Parkin CG
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 7(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 23439170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Low-Cost Inkjet-Printed Glucose Test Strip System for Resource-Poor Settings.
Gainey Wilson K; Ovington P; Dean D
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 9(6):1275-81. PubMed ID: 26071426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy Evaluation of a CE-Marked System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Three Reagent System Lots Following ISO 15197:2013.
Salzsieder E; Berg S
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 10(1):238-9. PubMed ID: 26394775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Introduction of a Novel Smartphone-Coupled Blood Glucose Monitoring System.
Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Chen CH; Rittmeyer D; Haug C; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1231-1233. PubMed ID: 28459160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197.
Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Högel J; Haug C
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 26062008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems: System Accuracy, Measurement Repeatability, and Intermediate Measurement Precision.
Pleus S; Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Mende J; Haug C; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 13(1):111-117. PubMed ID: 30286620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy Evaluation of a CE-Marked Glucometer System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Three Reagent Lots Following ISO 15197:2013.
Hehmke B; Berg S; Salzsieder E
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 May; 11(3):635-636. PubMed ID: 27707915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laboratory Evaluation of Linearity, Repeatability, and Hematocrit Interference With an Internet-Enabled Blood Glucose Meter.
Demircik F; Kirsch V; Ramljak S; Vogg M; Pfützner AH; Pfützner A
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 May; 13(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 30974988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy Evaluation of Two Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013.
Berti F; Scuffi C; Valgimigli F
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(6):1354-6. PubMed ID: 26224761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. ISO 15197: 2013 Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System's Measurement Accuracy.
Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Kamecke U; Haug C; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1275-1276. PubMed ID: 28849677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems.
Kuo CY; Hsu CT; Ho CS; Su TE; Wu MH; Wang CJ
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 May; 13(5):596-600. PubMed ID: 21406013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analytical performance of glucose monitoring systems at different blood glucose ranges and analysis of outliers in a clinical setting.
Hasslacher C; Kulozik F; Platten I
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 May; 8(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 24876607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods.
Freckmann G; Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Haug C
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):635-48. PubMed ID: 26110670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
