These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28406040)
1. Seven-Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip Product. Setford S; Grady M; Phillips S; Miller L; Mackintosh S; Cameron H; Corrigall K J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 28406040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence From a Long-Term, Systematic Post-Market Surveillance Program: Clinical Performance of a Hematocrit-Insensitive Blood Glucose Test Strip. Setford S; Phillips S; Grady M J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 15(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 30730221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Seven-Year Clinical Surveillance Program Demonstrates Consistent MARD Accuracy Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip. Setford S; Grady M; Mackintosh S; Donald R; Levy B J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1016-1023. PubMed ID: 29845873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing with Built-in Insulin Dose Advisor Based on ISO 15197:2013: System Accuracy and Hematocrit Influence. Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Liebing C; Beer A; Flacke F; Haug C; Freckmann G Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Apr; 20(4):303-313. PubMed ID: 29664706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations. Freckmann G; Schmid C; Baumstark A; Rutschmann M; Haug C; Heinemann L J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):885-94. PubMed ID: 25872965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Hematocrit Influence on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Based on ISO 15197:2013: Comparison of a Novel System With Five Systems With Different Hematocrit Ranges. Hattemer A; Wardat S J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 12(2):333-340. PubMed ID: 29374966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of a new test strip for freestyle blood glucose monitoring systems. Lock JP; Brazg R; Bernstein RM; Taylor E; Patel M; Ward J; Alva S; Chen T; Welsh Z; Amor W; Bhogal C; Ng R Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 Jan; 13(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21142975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers. Brazg RL; Klaff LJ; Parkin CG J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 7(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 23439170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Low-Cost Inkjet-Printed Glucose Test Strip System for Resource-Poor Settings. Gainey Wilson K; Ovington P; Dean D J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 9(6):1275-81. PubMed ID: 26071426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy Evaluation of a CE-Marked System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Three Reagent System Lots Following ISO 15197:2013. Salzsieder E; Berg S J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 10(1):238-9. PubMed ID: 26394775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197. Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Högel J; Haug C Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 26062008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems: System Accuracy, Measurement Repeatability, and Intermediate Measurement Precision. Pleus S; Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Mende J; Haug C; Freckmann G J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 13(1):111-117. PubMed ID: 30286620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy Evaluation of a CE-Marked Glucometer System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Three Reagent Lots Following ISO 15197:2013. Hehmke B; Berg S; Salzsieder E J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 May; 11(3):635-636. PubMed ID: 27707915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laboratory Evaluation of Linearity, Repeatability, and Hematocrit Interference With an Internet-Enabled Blood Glucose Meter. Demircik F; Kirsch V; Ramljak S; Vogg M; Pfützner AH; Pfützner A J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 May; 13(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 30974988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy Evaluation of Two Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013. Berti F; Scuffi C; Valgimigli F J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(6):1354-6. PubMed ID: 26224761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. ISO 15197: 2013 Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System's Measurement Accuracy. Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Kamecke U; Haug C; Freckmann G J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1275-1276. PubMed ID: 28849677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems. Kuo CY; Hsu CT; Ho CS; Su TE; Wu MH; Wang CJ Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 May; 13(5):596-600. PubMed ID: 21406013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analytical performance of glucose monitoring systems at different blood glucose ranges and analysis of outliers in a clinical setting. Hasslacher C; Kulozik F; Platten I J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 May; 8(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 24876607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods. Freckmann G; Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Haug C Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):635-48. PubMed ID: 26110670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]