BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28406291)

  • 1. Using Ligand-Induced Protein Chemical Shift Perturbations To Determine Protein-Ligand Structures.
    Yu Z; Li P; Merz KM
    Biochemistry; 2017 May; 56(18):2349-2362. PubMed ID: 28406291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A critical assessment of the performance of protein-ligand scoring functions based on NMR chemical shift perturbations.
    Wang B; Westerhoff LM; Merz KM
    J Med Chem; 2007 Oct; 50(21):5128-34. PubMed ID: 17867664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of protein-ligand docking with simulated chemical shift perturbations.
    Ten Brink T; Aguirre C; Exner TE; Krimm I
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Feb; 55(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 25357133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auto-FACE: an NMR based binding site mapping program for fast chemical exchange protein-ligand systems.
    Krishnamoorthy J; Yu VC; Mok YK
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e8943. PubMed ID: 20174626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Principal component analysis of chemical shift perturbation data of a multiple-ligand-binding system for elucidation of respective binding mechanism.
    Konuma T; Lee YH; Goto Y; Sakurai K
    Proteins; 2013 Jan; 81(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 22927212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Steering protein-ligand docking with quantitative NMR chemical shift perturbations.
    González-Ruiz D; Gohlke H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2260-71. PubMed ID: 19795907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protein-ligand NOE matching: a high-throughput method for binding pose evaluation that does not require protein NMR resonance assignments.
    Constantine KL; Davis ME; Metzler WJ; Mueller L; Claus BL
    J Am Chem Soc; 2006 Jun; 128(22):7252-63. PubMed ID: 16734479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ligand
    Platzer G; Ptaszek AL; Böttcher J; Fuchs JE; Geist L; Braun D; McConnell DB; Konrat R; Sánchez-Murcia PA; Mayer M
    Chemphyschem; 2024 Jan; 25(1):e202300636. PubMed ID: 37955910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pose scoring by NMR.
    Wang B; Raha K; Merz KM
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Sep; 126(37):11430-1. PubMed ID: 15366876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated Fragmentation QM/MM Calculation of NMR Chemical Shifts for Protein-Ligand Complexes.
    Jin X; Zhu T; Zhang JZH; He X
    Front Chem; 2018; 6():150. PubMed ID: 29868556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of ligand binding modes in weak protein-ligand complexes using sparse NMR data.
    Mohanty B; Williams ML; Doak BC; Vazirani M; Ilyichova O; Wang G; Bermel W; Simpson JS; Chalmers DK; King GF; Mobli M; Scanlon MJ
    J Biomol NMR; 2016 Nov; 66(3):195-208. PubMed ID: 27778134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
    Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the binding site structure of the cellular retinol-binding protein (CRBP) by ligand NMR chemical shift perturbations.
    Wang B; Merz KM
    J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Apr; 127(15):5310-1. PubMed ID: 15826155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fragment quantum mechanical calculation of proteins and its applications.
    He X; Zhu T; Wang X; Liu J; Zhang JZ
    Acc Chem Res; 2014 Sep; 47(9):2748-57. PubMed ID: 24851673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photophysics of ANS. I. Protein-ANS complexes: Intestinal fatty acid binding protein and single-trp mutants.
    Klimtchuk E; Venyaminov S; Kurian E; Wessels W; Kirk W; Prendergast FG
    Biophys Chem; 2007 Jan; 125(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16978762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combining NMR Spectroscopy and Molecular Dynamic Simulations to Solve and Analyze the Structure of Protein-RNA Complexes.
    Campagne S; Krepl M; Sponer J; Allain FH
    Methods Enzymol; 2019; 614():393-422. PubMed ID: 30611432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NMR studies of ligand binding.
    Nitsche C; Otting G
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2018 Feb; 48():16-22. PubMed ID: 29017071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The NMR solution structure of intestinal fatty acid-binding protein complexed with palmitate: application of a novel distance geometry algorithm.
    Hodsdon ME; Ponder JW; Cistola DP
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Dec; 264(3):585-602. PubMed ID: 8969307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Antinociceptive Agent SBFI-26 Binds to Anandamide Transporters FABP5 and FABP7 at Two Different Sites.
    Hsu HC; Tong S; Zhou Y; Elmes MW; Yan S; Kaczocha M; Deutsch DG; Rizzo RC; Ojima I; Li H
    Biochemistry; 2017 Jul; 56(27):3454-3462. PubMed ID: 28632393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.