These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28406366)

  • 41. Bacterial communities in urban aerosols collected with wetted-wall cyclonic samplers and seasonal fluctuations of live and culturable airborne bacteria.
    Ravva SV; Hernlem BJ; Sarreal CZ; Mandrell RE
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Feb; 14(2):473-81. PubMed ID: 22193549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Bacteria emitted in ambient air during bronchoscopy-a risk to health care workers?
    Marchand G; Duchaine C; Lavoie J; Veillette M; Cloutier Y
    Am J Infect Control; 2016 Dec; 44(12):1634-1638. PubMed ID: 27388266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessment of types of bacterial bio-aerosols and concentrations in the indoor air of gyms.
    Zavieh FS; Mohammadi MJ; Vosoughi M; Abazari M; Raesee E; Fazlzadeh M; Geravandi S; Behzad A
    Environ Geochem Health; 2021 May; 43(5):2165-2173. PubMed ID: 33400007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Eggshells as a source for occupational exposure to airborne bacteria in hatcheries.
    Brauner P; Klug K; Jäckel U
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016 Dec; 13(12):950-959. PubMed ID: 27341051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Characterization of bacterial contaminants in the air of a duck hatchery by cultivation based and molecular methods.
    Martin E; Jäckel U
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Feb; 13(2):464-70. PubMed ID: 21170464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A method development for bacterial quantification and qualification in occupational exposure.
    Zendehdel R; Montazer M; Soleimani N
    Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Jan; 192(2):82. PubMed ID: 31897757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Monitoring of bacterial pathogens at workplaces in power plant using biochemical and molecular methods.
    Ławniczek-Wałczyk A; Gołofit-Szymczak M; Cyprowski M; Stobnicka A; Górny RL
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2017 Apr; 90(3):285-295. PubMed ID: 28124138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Field testing of a personal size-selective bioaerosol sampler.
    Kenny LC; Bowry A; Crook B; Stancliffe JD
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):393-404. PubMed ID: 10518465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Reduction and characterization of bioaerosols in a wastewater treatment station via ventilation.
    Guo X; Wu P; Ding W; Zhang W; Li L
    J Environ Sci (China); 2014 Aug; 26(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 25108713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Relative and contextual contribution of different sources to the composition and abundance of indoor air bacteria in residences.
    Miletto M; Lindow SE
    Microbiome; 2015 Dec; 3():61. PubMed ID: 26653310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Categorisation of culturable bioaerosols in a fruit juice manufacturing facility.
    Theisinger SM; de Smidt O; Lues JFR
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0242969. PubMed ID: 33882058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sampling and analysis methods of air-borne microorganisms in hospital air: a review.
    Wei X; Ma X; Tian F; Wei Z; Zhang L; Hu K
    Biotechniques; 2024; 76(8):395-404. PubMed ID: 39263851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Microbial Air Quality in Neighborhoods near Landfill Sites: Implications for Public Health.
    Odonkor ST; Mahami T
    J Environ Public Health; 2020; 2020():4609164. PubMed ID: 32733576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dispersion characteristics of bioaerosols during treatment of rural solid waste in northwest China.
    Liu J; Yu X; Wang Y; Han Y; Cao Y; Wang Z; Lyu J; Zhou Z; Yan Y; Zheng T
    Environ Pollut; 2023 May; 324():121338. PubMed ID: 36842620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Development of a methodological approach for the characterization of bioaerosols in exhaust air from pig fattening farms with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
    Druckenmüller K; Gärtner A; Jäckel U; Klug K; Schiffels J; Günther K; Elbers G
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2017 Aug; 220(6):974-983. PubMed ID: 28669773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Fungal burden in waste industry: an occupational risk to be solved.
    Viegas C; Faria T; dos Santos M; Carolino E; Gomes AQ; Sabino R; Viegas S
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Apr; 187(4):199. PubMed ID: 25796518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Emission of bacterial bioaerosols from a composting facility in Maharashtra, India.
    Pahari AK; Dasgupta D; Patil RS; Mukherji S
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jul; 53():22-31. PubMed ID: 27155946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Bioaerosol exposure from composting facilities and health outcomes in workers and in the community: A systematic review update.
    Robertson S; Douglas P; Jarvis D; Marczylo E
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2019 Apr; 222(3):364-386. PubMed ID: 30876873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of exposure-response relationships for health effects of microbial bioaerosols - A systematic review.
    Walser SM; Gerstner DG; Brenner B; Bünger J; Eikmann T; Janssen B; Kolb S; Kolk A; Nowak D; Raulf M; Sagunski H; Sedlmaier N; Suchenwirth R; Wiesmüller G; Wollin KM; Tesseraux I; Herr CE
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2015 Oct; 218(7):577-89. PubMed ID: 26272513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.