These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28406381)

  • 21. Mixed matters: fluency impacts trust ratings when faces range on valence but not on motivational implications.
    Olszanowski M; Kaminska OK; Winkielman P
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1032-1051. PubMed ID: 29057707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory hindsight bias: Fluency misattribution versus memory reconstruction.
    Higham PA; Neil GJ; Bernstein DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1144-1159. PubMed ID: 28263633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The relatedness effect on judgments of learning: A closer look at the contribution of processing fluency.
    Undorf M; Erdfelder E
    Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):647-58. PubMed ID: 25388520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. If it's hard to read, it's hard to do: processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation.
    Song H; Schwarz N
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Oct; 19(10):986-8. PubMed ID: 19000208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is that a human? Categorization (dis)fluency drives evaluations of agents ambiguous on human-likeness.
    Carr EW; Hofree G; Sheldon K; Saygin AP; Winkielman P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):651-666. PubMed ID: 28125254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visualizing pathogens: Disfluent shapes of pathogens increase their perceived complexity and danger while realism and disfluency boost the credibility of visualizations.
    Skulmowski A; Rey GD
    Hum Behav Emerg Technol; 2021 Apr; 3(2):316-323. PubMed ID: 33363273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Aesthetic Pleasure versus Aesthetic Interest: The Two Routes to Aesthetic Liking.
    Graf LK; Landwehr JR
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():15. PubMed ID: 28194119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can I cut the Gordian tnok? The impact of pronounceability, actual solvability, and length on intuitive problem assessments of anagrams.
    Topolinski S; Bakhtiari G; Erle TM
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():439-52. PubMed ID: 26550802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Do priming effects in perceptual identification and word judgment reflect different underlying mechanisms?
    Keane MM; Wong BM; Verfaellie M
    Am J Psychol; 2004; 117(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 15058859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The differential effects of fluency due to repetition and fluency due to color contrast on judgments of truth.
    Silva RR; Garcia-Marques T; Mello J
    Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):821-37. PubMed ID: 26224218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Familiarity and pronounceability of nouns and names.
    Surprenant AM; Hura SL; Harper MP; Jamieson LH; Long G; Thede SM; Rout A; Hsueh TH; Hockema SA; Johnson MT; Srinivasan PN; White CM; Laflen JB
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 1999 Nov; 31(4):638-49. PubMed ID: 10633979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Listener perceptions along a fluency--disfluency continuum: a phenomenological analysis.
    Susca M; Healey EC
    J Fluency Disord; 2002; 27(2):135-60; quiz 160-1. PubMed ID: 12145983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Loop and Enjoy: A Scoping Review of the Research on the Effects of Processing Fluency on Aesthetic Reactions to Auditory Stimuli.
    Popescu A; Holman AC
    Psychol Rep; 2024 Aug; ():332941241277474. PubMed ID: 39206490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fluency misattribution and auditory hindsight bias.
    Bernstein DM; Kumar R; Masson MEJ; Levitin DJ
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1331-1343. PubMed ID: 29978343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual fluency and judgments of vocal aesthetics and stereotypicality.
    Babel M; McGuire G
    Cogn Sci; 2015 May; 39(4):766-87. PubMed ID: 25244150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When does feeling of fluency matter?: how abstract and concrete thinking influence fluency effects.
    Tsai CI; Thomas M
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Mar; 22(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 21307273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When can listeners detect disfluency in spontaneous speech?
    Lickley RJ; Bard EG
    Lang Speech; 1998; 41 ( Pt 2)():203-26. PubMed ID: 10194877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Manual disfluency in drawing while producing and listening to disfluent speech.
    Dayalu V; Teulings HL; Bowers A; Crawcour S; Saltuklaroglu T
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Aug; 32(4):677-90. PubMed ID: 23810715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. People with easier to pronounce names promote truthiness of claims.
    Newman EJ; Sanson M; Miller EK; Quigley-McBride A; Foster JL; Bernstein DM; Garry M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88671. PubMed ID: 24586368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The learned reinterpretation of fluency in amnesia.
    Geurten M; Willems S
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 101():10-16. PubMed ID: 28495597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.