BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28406682)

  • 1. Overcoming indecision by changing the decision boundary.
    Malhotra G; Leslie DS; Ludwig CJH; Bogacz R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jun; 146(6):776-805. PubMed ID: 28406682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-varying decision boundaries: insights from optimality analysis.
    Malhotra G; Leslie DS; Ludwig CJH; Bogacz R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):971-996. PubMed ID: 28730465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integration to boundary in decisions between numerical sequences.
    Glickman M; Usher M
    Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():104022. PubMed ID: 31369923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normative decision rules in changing environments.
    Barendregt NW; Gold JI; Josić K; Kilpatrick ZP
    Elife; 2022 Oct; 11():. PubMed ID: 36282065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do humans produce the speed-accuracy trade-off that maximizes reward rate?
    Bogacz R; Hu PT; Holmes PJ; Cohen JD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):863-91. PubMed ID: 19746300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning to allocate limited time to decisions with different expected outcomes.
    Khodadadi A; Fakhari P; Busemeyer JR
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Jun; 95():17-49. PubMed ID: 28441518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimality and some of its discontents: successes and shortcomings of existing models for binary decisions.
    Holmes P; Cohen JD
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Apr; 6(2):258-78. PubMed ID: 24648411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions.
    Rae B; Heathcote A; Donkin C; Averell L; Brown S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1226-43. PubMed ID: 24797438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Does Not Affect the Decrease of Decision Threshold during the Choice Process When There Is No Conflict, Time Pressure, or Reward.
    Leimbach F; Georgiev D; Litvak V; Antoniades C; Limousin P; Jahanshahi M; Bogacz R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 30(6):876-884. PubMed ID: 29488846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence and corrections: how we make and un-make up our minds.
    Pearson J; Platt ML
    Neuron; 2009 Sep; 63(6):724-6. PubMed ID: 19778502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of aging on the speed-accuracy compromise: Boundary optimality in the diffusion model.
    Starns JJ; Ratcliff R
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Jun; 25(2):377-90. PubMed ID: 20545422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Cognition/Metacognition Trade-Off.
    Rosenbaum D; Glickman M; Fleming SM; Usher M
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Apr; 33(4):613-628. PubMed ID: 35333670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How environmental regularities affect people's information search in probability judgments from experience.
    Hoffart JC; Rieskamp J; Dutilh G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):219-231. PubMed ID: 30024248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tuning the speed-accuracy trade-off to maximize reward rate in multisensory decision-making.
    Drugowitsch J; DeAngelis GC; Angelaki DE; Pouget A
    Elife; 2015 Jun; 4():e06678. PubMed ID: 26090907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of passing time in decision-making.
    Evans NJ; Hawkins GE; Brown SD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):316-326. PubMed ID: 31180704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of reward magnitude on stimulus memory and stimulus generalization in categorization decisions.
    Schlegelmilch R; von Helversen B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Oct; 149(10):1823-1854. PubMed ID: 32191082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reward optimization in the primate brain: a probabilistic model of decision making under uncertainty.
    Huang Y; Rao RP
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53344. PubMed ID: 23349707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reward-dependent learning in neuronal networks for planning and decision making.
    Dehaene S; Changeux JP
    Prog Brain Res; 2000; 126():217-29. PubMed ID: 11105649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-trial dynamics explain magnitude sensitive decision making.
    Pirrone A; Wen W; Li S
    BMC Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 19(1):54. PubMed ID: 30200889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dopamine Manipulation Affects Response Vigor Independently of Opportunity Cost.
    Zénon A; Devesse S; Olivier E
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(37):9516-25. PubMed ID: 27629704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.